Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

This topic has been used as a repricoral to Tako's Update Discussion Topic.

On this Update Discussion topic Tako wrote:

This is the official thread to discuss the most recent update(s)

So, since that topic has been used for disscussing the most recent updates that is the reason why I have created this topic that talks about a previous update. And of course with the moderation situation, no updates are being released, not provoking any update-related conversations. So the premiss of this topic is to talk about one previous update. Please do NOT talk about the reasons of why I have created this topic as opposed to Tako's topic, that would just be spam. If the forum moderators need to take such action, then I am acceptant, but I couldn't imagine the point, really...

Anywho, the question I wanted to ask was:

cXH3zE5.png

B42NJ34.png

So, If you have a look at this blog post,   you can see that the EE moderators had suggested a 'back to basic' theme. This involved open worlds being able to only contain basic blocks, metal blocks, gravity arrows and crowns. But do you think this was beneficial at reducing the 'nostalgic' theme alot of players were talking about?

I would like to hear your opinion's on this matter. I know the post was a little out-dated and a few comments were made on it. But since alot of players talk about the nostalgia, I wanted a full discussion about it.

Anywho, thank you for reading!

/Alex //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

#2 Before February 2015

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

The back to basic game is hard to say if it was better or worse, but is...
A open world is a world that everyone have edit to do everything they want, but now is only basic blocks, we wanted to use more blocks. But the good thing is that it prevent abuse like trolling coins or other. But i would prefer use other blocks.
...WORSE


This is a false statement.

Offline

#3 Before February 2015

Anch
Member
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 5,447

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

cooltext1624998815.png

Offline

#4 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

I tried to write this comment:

Good updates typically do not consist of removing functionality unless that functionality sucked and/or was buggy. Open worlds were neither. This update is bad and it should feel bad.

but apparently "sucked" is so bad a word that it didn't even make it to the moderation queue. It only said "This comment could not be posted" until I removed that terrible word.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#5 Before February 2015

Fdoou
Banned

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

this update is for the better.
boosts were making those worldtypes HELL.

#6 Before February 2015

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

The open worlds currently allow potions and there aren't any ways of disabling it.


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

#7 Before February 2015

sthegreat
Member
Joined: 2015-04-25
Posts: 409

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

XxAtillaxX wrote:

The open worlds currently allow potions and there aren't any ways of disabling it.

Dats terrible.


user.php?id=sthegreat

Offline

#8 Before February 2015

Fdoou
Banned

Re: This is the mod's attempt at satisfying the nostalgia...

meanwhile ee trololo just laughs at every one of these worlds

Alexthementalone 142393960421828

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1731908472.206 - Generated in 0.033 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.48 MiB (Peak: 1.61 MiB) ]