Guardian Vote

mrjawapa · Before February 2015

anch159 wrote:

#FdoouBimpsAndiPwner4Guiardian

#No

Creature · Before February 2015

JaWapa wrote:

anch159 wrote:
#FdoouBimpsAndiPwner4Guiardian
#No

#Yes

mrjawapa · Before February 2015

Creature wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
anch159 wrote:
#FdoouBimpsAndiPwner4Guiardian
#No
#Yes

1. Why must you turn everything into spam...

2. Why is this still up for discussion?

3. Whatever happens, happens. If someone stupid is put in place and they abuse their powers, the community will certainly report them.

Creature · Before February 2015

1. Why must you turn everything into spam...

I don't turn nothing into spam, i post when is already spam.

2. Why is this still up for discussion?

Because it's our vote.

3. Whatever happens, happens. If someone stupid is put in place and they abuse their powers, the community will certainly report them.

I don't care.

Last edited by Creature (Jul 21 2014 3:16:48 pm)

some woman · Before February 2015

Creature wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
1. Why must you turn everything into spam...
I don't turn nothing into spam, i post when is already spam.

Then you have a pretty loose definition of what spam is.

Creature wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
2. Why is this still up for discussion?
Because it's our vote.

But everyone's already voted and there's not really much else to talk about.

Creature wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
3. Whatever happens, happens. If someone stupid is put in place and they abuse their powers, the community will certainly report them.
I don't care.

As in you don't care if fdoou is a guardian and he spams /reportabuse and/or bans for everyone? Try to know more about what you want to argue about before you leap into discussion.

Creature · Before February 2015

You are trying to make me don't vote Fdoou.

some woman · Before February 2015

Creature wrote:

You are trying to make me don't vote Fdoou.

Have fun with fdoou abusing his powers, then.

Creature · Before February 2015

some man wrote:

Creature wrote:
You are trying to make me don't vote Fdoou.
Have fun with fdoou abusing his powers, then.

Have fun you too

Tachyonic · Before February 2015

>implying fdoou doesn't have the option of using his powers responsibly

Fdoou · Before February 2015

you guys are giving me so much attention

Creature · Before February 2015

Fdoou wrote:

you guys are giving me so much attention

Yeah, we love you

Anch · Before February 2015

some man wrote:

Creature wrote:
JaWapa wrote:
1. Why must you turn everything into spam...
I don't turn nothing into spam, i post when is already spam.
Then you have a pretty loose definition of what spam is.

Wikipedia wrote:

Spam is a canned precooked meat product made by the Hormel Foods Corporation, first introduced in 1937.

I'm sorry I just had to DX

Tako · Before February 2015

The rules forbid useless and irrelevant posts. Saying "#Yes"/"#No", confessing your love for Fdoou, or talking about canned meat products are all examples of a useless or irrelevant post.

I have warned anch159. The rest of you need to stop talking about things other than who would / would not make a good Guardian.

I repeat, the only thing you should post is a reason why someone would / would not make a good Guardian. Nothing else. I'm going to be less forgiving about spam after this post. @JaWapa and Creature, I'm paying special attention to you.

Tako · Before February 2015

Tachyonic wrote:

>implying fdoou doesn't have the option of using his powers responsibly

I'm not saying he's incapable, I'm just saying I wouldn't trust him. And he has a reputation of playing around, which is not something I'd want to see in a Guardian.

mrjawapa · Before February 2015

Tako wrote:

Tachyonic wrote:
>implying fdoou doesn't have the option of using his powers responsibly
I'm not saying he's incapable, I'm just saying I wouldn't trust him. And he has a reputation of playing around, which is not something I'd want to see in a Guardian.

I don't trust hardly anyone...
I would trust KingOfTheOzone, and Buzzerbee. That is it.

Fdoou · Before February 2015

cow is right

Master1 · Before February 2015

Thy Cowman wrote:

Many of the players nominated in this thread would likely abuse their privileges - banning young children, slightly annoying players, or just players out of petty revenge.

I honestly can't see anyone abusing it, unless they are younger than 10. Anyone older than that should know that abusing it will only lead to them getting in serious trouble themselves, and eventually being banned by MrShoe/Mrvoid/Brian.
*edit*

Thy Cowman wrote:

Please don't allow the community to vote for guardians.

I don't think it is, or was meant to be official. Just something Meredith could send to the EE team so they had at least something to work off of. After all, they hardly know any of us. A vote may not be the best way to give them information, but it's more reliable than one or two random people sending them a few names.

Last edited by Master1 (Jul 22 2014 4:42:38 pm)

mrjawapa · Before February 2015

Can the mods ban each other? It would be kind of stupid if you could...

Koto · Before February 2015

Actually, that could potentially be the funniest chapter in EE's history.

Alexthementalone · Before February 2015

JaWapa wrote:

Can the mods ban each other? It would be kind of stupid if you could...

I highly doubt that. What would be the point of the administrators giving banning privileges to Guardians so they can ban other mods. The admins must've surely looked over that.

/Alex

mrjawapa · Before February 2015

KingOfTheOzone wrote:

Actually, that could potentially be the funniest chapter in EE's history.

Yeah, it would be pretty humorous.
If they were banned I am sure they could easily un-ban themselves.
@Alex - I only see Chris putting something in place to prevent that. I could see Shoe completely overlooking it.

Last edited by JaWapa (Jul 22 2014 5:35:04 pm)

Alexthementalone · Before February 2015

JaWapa wrote:

KingOfTheOzone wrote:
Actually, that could potentially be the funniest chapter in EE's history.
Yeah, it would be pretty humorous.
If they were banned I am sure they could easily un-ban themselves.
@Alex - I only see Chris putting something in place to prevent that. I could see Shoe completely overlooking it.

I suppose so, as we've seen a few examples of the mods incompetence...

/Alex

N1KF · Before February 2015

Helvi wrote:

Meredith wrote:
If they act in a mature and appropriate manner then should their age restrict them?
Based on my 5 years experience as volunteer for a single game I cannot believe that anyone younger than 23 is able to judge without any bit of bias toward anyone. Especially acting within the ruleset for the given game. It took a while to get into such stuff and it took me alot more time to train and teach others who joined "our" team.

This is false. Anybody. with any personality will have some bias. Bias is part of the concept of a personality and point of view. Everybody has a different personality, and even if they were grown up the same way, they would all be different. If people were to have no bias, they would have no personality.

Back onto my point, children should be allowed if they are mature enough. Though, there is no accurate way of judging maturity, mainly because the internet is a place where each person is mostly anonymous, and can hide their true actions. Anybody we know that seems "mature" could turn back on us and ban anybody. Though, there is very low of chance, it can be somewhat true if my points are downplayed a bit.

Maturity is not an accurate way of judging, due to my recently mentioned points, and the fact that many people mature in different ways. Back when I was 9 (which was just a few years ago), I was very immature, but got over it through a painful experience. I see myself more mature compared to back then, but acknowledge I will act different in the next few years. While age is factual and easier to confirm (maybe not so much on the internet, but maturity is even harder to judge online), maturity is an abstract concept that cannot be measured.

Yes, there should be an age restriction and a NDA to be signed to make sure that none of the Guardians do not even think of abusing their access and abilities given by the game devs. I really hope the current games integrity remains untouched with the introduction of half-OPs etc.

I disagree with the age restriction (as stated above), but I have mixed feelings about the N.D.A. As stated in the third paragraph, users on the internet can be very misleading about how they act. Though I act much different than I do in real life, I have led to become much different than in real life. Though my experiences on the internet has changed myself both in the internet and in real life.

-

More on-topic with the first post, I am personally not voting, simply because some people vote for the wrong reasons, and also because I do not want to be involved in an argument. I do not think that simply voting will help, as the mods need to do research on who these people are. Despite the facts I stated in the third paragraph, I have logically concluded that this is the best plan for finding the correct guardians.

skullz17 · Before February 2015

It doesn't actually matter if someone bad is chosen. They gain power but even people who aren't guardians have some power. Power to break the rules. And nobody is going to go around to only let people who definitely won't break the rules play EE, before they even start playing. So the same goes for guardians, it's not a problem until they actually break rules. The people picked can easily be replaced, I'm sure, and things that they do can be undone, or dealt with.

Fdoou · Before February 2015

@wall of text

ha! lots of words, nothing's being said. ANY questionable banning will be public. No one is going to be able to sneak into a dark alleyway and ban people there. This position of power requires people to make unbiased decisions, and it turns out that it is possible, despite how strongly you believe it isn't!

was a rule broken? punish appropriately
was a report false? do not punish said person

there is not a lot up to choice of the "guardian" here. they can't just slip someone getting banned under a rug. it's all logged.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#151 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#152 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#153 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#154 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#155 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#156 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#157 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#158 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#159 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#160 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#161 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#162 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#163 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#164 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#165 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#166 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#167 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#168 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#169 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#170 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#171 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#172 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#173 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#174 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

#175 Before February 2015

Re: Guardian Vote

Board footer