Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Since the implementation of nonchats there has been an increase in abuse of nonchats.
I point to two noteworthy types of abuse, the first of which with two instances noteworthy, and the other with instances countless.
The first type of abuse is... pretending to be friends with nonchats!
This is very famously attributed to Matt, who pretends to be friends with nonchats.
However there is also Toxic, who I believe does the same.
Another terrible terror that has occurred is the muting of nonchats. When someone mutes a nonchat, no one notices.
The nonchat does not even know that he or she has been muted.
Based on these, I propose that a nonchat chat be implemented.
Therefore there will be a chat for nonchats and a separate chat for chats.
This will prevent the two types of abuse that nonchats are widespread known widespread to suffer widespread.
Last edited by GKAbyss (Oct 26 2014 7:30:13 pm)
that's possibly the worst idea i ever heard
its possible though
1. get guardian account (just hack jawapa no one will notice)
2. make bot that parrots everything it hears (nonchats only)
3. u did it
I strongly disagree.
I think that it isn't with respect to what you said but not with respect to the fact that it is among the ideas that you have heard.
Last edited by GKAbyss (Oct 26 2014 8:15:29 pm)
Therefore there will be a chat for nonchats and a separate chat for chats.
If there is a chat for nonchats, why would one bother to pay to get a "different" kind of chat? :O
derp
go watch mlp
everyone will be proud of u
just search "mlp sweep"
Offline
Same as paying to be stuck in a different server, free chat back is better.
This is a false statement.
Offline
WE should just kill them all and be done with it.
I mean they're just the same as we lets treat them with respect.
Offline
there should be a chat for nonchats
FAIL
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
I highly agree. Nonchats = lowlife noob discussions
Chats = civil just chat.
chats aren't civil, bad people have chat.
GKAbyss wrote:there should be a chat for nonchats
FAIL
I don't follow your logic.
ok
Offline
some man wrote:GKAbyss wrote:there should be a chat for nonchats
FAIL
I don't follow your logic.
Nonchats
should not have their own
chat.
That completely removes the definition of nonchat.
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
Wait, so if there is a chat for nonchat and a seperate chat for chats, whats the point of getting chat anyway when there is already chat for nonchats? That is basically seperating the chats and nonchats. kind of discriminating, really.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1731933539.7378 - Generated in 0.042 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.5 MiB (Peak: 1.65 MiB) ]