Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#26 Before February 2015

supadorf24
Member
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 2,675

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Nighter wrote:

This is made up. They are lying. There just SAYING that to get our whinning **** to shut up. Do you not get thatr? Nou and the rest of you saying this isn't made up. Well actually it is. Cause, Where is the proff. Well? Huh? Gonna tell me where is the proof? Nou made that up that but I see no screen shot or proof of it.
Untill I see proof. Then your lying to me.

You're awfully cynical. I think we can all trust Nou not to lie, and I would hope you could trust the rest of us too.

Offline

#27 Before February 2015

Breadfinn
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,063

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Nighter wrote:

This is made up. They are lying. There just SAYING that to get our whinning **** to shut up. Do you not get thatr? Nou and the rest of you saying this isn't made up. Well actually it is. Cause, Where is the proff. Well? Huh? Gonna tell me where is the proof? Nou made that up that but I see no screen shot or proof of it.
Untill I see proof. Then your lying to me.

Proof?

Nou wrote:

Nou_EE:            oh Benjaminsen sometimes if you hold shift it wont delete blocks
Benjaminsen:      Nou_EE: it stays to the layer you start at
Benjaminsen:      i.e. if you click the bg first it will only delete bg
Nou_EE            ohh, that explains a lot

There's our proof. No one actually knew that until Chris told us about it.


5671.jpg

Offline

#28 Before February 2015

EE_Scythe
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Nighter wrote:

This is made up. They are lying. There just SAYING that to get our whinning **** to shut up. Do you not get thatr? Nou and the rest of you saying this isn't made up. Well actually it is. Cause, Where is the proff. Well? Huh? Gonna tell me where is the proof? Nou made that up that but I see no screen shot or proof of it.
Untill I see proof. Then your lying to me.

A Handful of people can Confirm this including me because I too was there. Would you like some proof? How about you sit tight and wait for the Update. Come back to this topic for forgiveness then.

#29 Before February 2015

0176
Member
From: Brazil
Joined: 2021-09-05
Posts: 3,174

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

ashes941 wrote:

i dont like the background colors, period. i want only black   back. the background   colors makes ur caracter look really small and stupid

How we're going to make day levels then?

Offline

#30 Before February 2015

EE_Scythe
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Or he could simply not use them.

#31 Before February 2015

Toby
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

ThuggishPrune wrote:

So we aren't getting text?! WTF. I'm already **** about the damn physics being ****ed with and they aren't going back. now this. Thanks Chris.

Pretty sure no-one ever said they'd be released. They're too abusable and we only ever intended for the tutorial room...

#32 Before February 2015

Cola1
Member
From: We will meet again as stars
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 3,281

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

N-n-no text?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
noooooooooo.jpg
noooo_answer_2_xlarge.jpeg
AqfHA.png


smilpat.gif
kQgdwOD.png

Offline

#33 Before February 2015

DK Levels
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Who cares if we won't get text? It looks ugly and will probably be abused by noobs anyway.

#34 Before February 2015

ThuggishPrune
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

I do! I wanted to add storylines to my worlds!

#35 Before February 2015

Ruiner
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

I don't get how text is especially abusable. I mean, you could write offensive content with it, but you can do that now with regular blocks. Anyway, the solution is to have signs that you have to type the text into so that the system can filter it for inappropriate content. Then a player has to approach the sign to read it, which pops up a dialogue showing the text. Maybe only players with chat could read them.

#36 Before February 2015

D-rock2308
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Did he say anything about the graphics on the regular bricks? They seem too cartoony to the other bricks which needs to be fixed one way or another. Same with dots and arrows.

#37 Before February 2015

Pawlowic
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Anyway.I just have to tell you all:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNGc9zmpK5M[/youtube]

#38 Before February 2015

Pyromaniac
Official Caroler
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,868

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

n-no

text?

*dies*

Offline

#39 Before February 2015

supadorf24
Member
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 2,675

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Toby wrote:
ThuggishPrune wrote:

So we aren't getting text?! WTF. I'm already **** about the damn physics being ****ed with and they aren't going back. now this. Thanks Chris.

Pretty sure no-one ever said they'd be released. They're too abusable and we only ever intended for the tutorial room...

Just disable text for non-chat players. Problem solved.

The worst that could be done with text is swearing, and that's nothing compared to what goes on in the chat. Chat is the most abusable feature in EE and every other chat-enabled game--crashing worlds, flooding--yet you're worried about static text.

Offline

#40 Before February 2015

plat aka kingpooultra
Member
Joined: 2017-05-27
Posts: 3,873

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

well, if Chris goes through with all this then I will stay //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile to bad there will be no text bricks //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

Offline

#41 Before February 2015

Zalgryth
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Addi wrote:
Nighter wrote:

This is made up. They are lying. There just SAYING that to get our whinning **** to shut up. Do you not get thatr? Nou and the rest of you saying this isn't made up. Well actually it is. Cause, Where is the proff. Well? Huh? Gonna tell me where is the proof? Nou made that up that but I see no screen shot or proof of it.
Untill I see proof. Then your lying to me.

Proof?

Nou wrote:

Nou_EE:            oh Benjaminsen sometimes if you hold shift it wont delete blocks
Benjaminsen:      Nou_EE: it stays to the layer you start at
Benjaminsen:      i.e. if you click the bg first it will only delete bg
Nou_EE            ohh, that explains a lot

There's our proof. No one actually knew that until Chris told us about it.

I actually figured that out right away. I was testing around with it. Even told a few people.

But in any case, I don't believe this to be made up.

#42 Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh
Member
From: DMV
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,166
Website

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Yeah, it's pretty f*#ked up we don't get them.   And no one was expecting mod mode.   We can hack it anyways.


32ortonedge32dh.gif

Offline

#43 Before February 2015

Superbud9123
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

I am still not satisfied at all! So what he fixes the damn dot bridges all of my minis are broken now! This is unnecessary complication! Just change he physics back!

#44 Before February 2015

Nou
Member
Joined: 2015-02-24
Posts: 2,762

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Superbud9123 wrote:

I am still not satisfied at all! So what he fixes the damn dot bridges all of my minis are broken now! This is unnecessary complication! Just change he physics back!

RPGMaster2000 wrote:
Nou wrote:

Chris has said the physics will be closer to the old ones a lot more. I don't have a direct quote but he did. I've even played a temporal alpha version for a few minutes and it felt a lot like the old physics. They won't be completely the same but I found them satisfying.

The fact that you enjoyed them makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. Seems like things will be getting back to business as usual soon enough. //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile


No u.

Offline

#45 Before February 2015

Superbud9123
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Pawlowic wrote:

Anyway.I just have to tell you all:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNGc9zmpK5M[/youtube]

This doesn't fix anything! My minis are still going to be broken!

#46 Before February 2015

Superbud9123
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Nou wrote:
Superbud9123 wrote:

I am still not satisfied at all! So what he fixes the damn dot bridges all of my minis are broken now! This is unnecessary complication! Just change he physics back!

RPGMaster2000 wrote:
Nou wrote:

Chris has said the physics will be closer to the old ones a lot more. I don't have a direct quote but he did. I've even played a temporal alpha version for a few minutes and it felt a lot like the old physics. They won't be completely the same but I found them satisfying.

The fact that you enjoyed them makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. Seems like things will be getting back to business as usual soon enough. //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

There is a VERY fine line for my minis. They were barely possible before, so unless it's exactly the same, it's all broken.

#47 Before February 2015

TrappedTime
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

I'm expecting not getting text blocks //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/cool
WHAT?! YOU MEAN WE'RE NOT?! YES!!! THANK THE LORD!!

(What everyone else should be doing ^ )

#48 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,574

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

Superbud. Don't double post. Be sure to read the rules so you don't break them again.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#49 Before February 2015

kevin1224
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

benjaminsen i will have fan smiley
//forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

#50 Before February 2015

kevin1224
Guest

Re: Benjaminsen Q&A 29 July

benjaminsen i will have fan smiley

Nou142388138080052

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1714824731.9783 - Generated in 0.089 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.68 MiB (Peak: 1.92 MiB) ]