Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Ive got one so far thinking of buying another one.
Why would you pay 100$ for one simple block and then even think of buying another? 0.o
Only reason I can think of is that you really want to support Everybody Edits.
Last edited by Fir3Fli3 (May 7 2011 4:46:03 am)
Or if you want little kids to think you're really really cool and waste your parents' money :rolleyes:
No u.
Offline
I didnt waste my money i earnt all 500 gems, i bought it when it was 500 duh.
Fine, you wasted your GEMS then.
Offline
I have... *drumroll* 0.
I've got 0 and if I had enough gems to buy one I would buy something usefull...
Last edited by NuclearWar (May 7 2011 5:56:30 am)
1 is really enough. You can better buy the bigspender or portals
I have 0
Offline
I have 0, and it will stay that way unless we get one free.... which we wont.
I'd rather get the big spender with the gems i've earned.
I don't see any reason to get more then 1.
Maybe if you have rich parents or a good job and want to waste much money for a 16x16 picture.
Offline
I don't see any reason to get more then 1.
Maybe if you have rich parents or a good job and want to waste much money for a 16x16 picture.
Last time I checked on a diamond level it looked LESS than 16x16!
I have 0. I'm not planning on buying any.
Ihave 0 Gems and only 1 portal since we all got one free I guess.
But I have 0 Diamonds. There useless anyway. VERY Useless. Why would Chris put it to 500 anyway? Thats even more then the GreatSavedWorld since its huge.
I got 0, but a friend of mine: Norwegianboy got 4! + Big spender and Alot of portals!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0, and unless I win a lottery there's no way I'm gonna buy one this decade.
Offline
ZERO
And it's going to stay that way unless the price is lowered to something like 50 gems
aka towwl
Offline
I never buy gems and never will.
0
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1727456996.2689 - Generated in 0.083 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.44 MiB (Peak: 1.57 MiB) ]