Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
i really need this size well to be hionest i need a 636x200 world but tehat goes over 100K blocks but 636x150 goes under 100K or you can do a 636x140 world cuz that is unde 90K
sometimes you just need a weir dshape world that doesnt exist in ee it will eb bette rto create our own size of worlds that are under 100K blocks give it a name and let ee calculate a fiar nice price for it and you cna dicide to share it with others so they can buy it or not when it goes over 100K blocks it will not be acepted and therefor you can tbuy it or you can buy it btut with a warning that it migh tnot save properly you can still buy the normal world sizes if u want world sizes CANT be bigger then the minimap can cover the screen if u rly want this world u gotta pay a lot for osmehting the maby even doesnt save proprely so think about buying this world (or maby there is something to fix this issue with PIO or there is someone to make aomething where we can store worlds in)
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Offline
300 * 300 = 90.000
636 * 150 = 95.400
636 * 140 = 89.040
Maximum is somewhere at 80.000 blocks. So a 400x200 world can be saved completely, but a 300x300 world can't be saved when there are too many blocks. Now you even want to add more bad world sizes.
Offline
636*100 is indeed a good world size.
Offline
Any world size with the number 636 in it is not a good world size.
It actually is good
Width 636 means minimap will hover the whole width of the screen
Offline
300 * 300 = 90.000
636 * 150 = 95.400
636 * 140 = 89.040
Maximum is somewhere at 80.000 blocks. So a 400x200 world can be saved completely, but a 300x300 world can't be saved when there are too many blocks. Now you even want to add more bad world sizes.
latif fill a great world with sign sportals and switches and you will see its false buit you cant avoid that cuz thats PIO/ee if it was meant that huge worlds couldbt be saved cuz of 90K blocks then why ee added them?
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
N1KF wrote:Any world size with the number 636 in it is not a good world size.
It actually is good
Width 636 means minimap will hover the whole width of the screen
That is not relevant. Any world size with the number 636 in it is not a good world size.
Everybody Edits is Fred
Offline
bump no admin has said anything about this yet i still need soeme special world sizes to make special things some things need to be bigger then 400 and nee dot be hihger then 50 so you can use 636x50 cuz its only x50
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
N1KF wrote:destroyer123 wrote:150 tall is probably a bit too much, maybe 100 would be ok?
Why not just 600×150?
There is already one 636 wide world, so we might as well keep it consistent...
Any world size with the number 636 in it is not a good world size.
Everybody Edits is Fred
Offline
Any world size with the number 636 in it is not a good world size.
Well yes, youve already said that, but its too late to go back now
Plus apart from OCD reasons, theres nothing wrong with 636 worlds, it doesnt actually change anything with whats inside it
Offline
destroyer123 wrote:150 tall is probably a bit too much, maybe 100 would be ok?
Why not just 600×150?
its a nice size and it is 90K blocks bnut i heard tghat even 90K is a bit too much so 500x150 can be ok too or just a tool so we can choose our size withitn a limit of blocks ofcourse
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1711642873.2907 - Generated in 0.059 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.6 MiB (Peak: 1.79 MiB) ]