Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

Zumza · 2016-06-06 16:54:30

maxi123 wrote:

Zumza wrote:
maxi123 wrote:
Like proc pointed out, Smittyw tried to meat shield similar to how Alphajon did in game 7 (as mentioned in the post above)
SmittyW after vig claim
SmittyW wrote:
What have I done
i guess he realised that meat shield attempt was a total failure idk

Under any circumstance this could end up good for him.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-06 17:34:20

I'll explain my vote:

Kirby jumped on the bandwagon early in the game, trying to get me lynched. Gave no hint that his vote was meant as a joke. He was actually the first vote against me.

Then he lurks, and later comes back playing dumb, "I didn't know you could unvote."

When people pulled their votes off of me, Kirby bandwagoned on Bimps.

--

Kuba also voted early, and gave no hint that their vote was a joke. And they keep lurking.

Creature · 2016-06-06 17:57:34

!vote Kirby

That's a terrible OMGUS vote.

realmaster42 · 2016-06-06 18:12:15

Zumza wrote:

SmittyW wrote:
I can guarantee that I'm a vigilante. No hidden abilities or other bs. Cross my <3. XOXOXOXO
I really didn't expect someone to counterclaim because I assumed there was only one killing PR but marco sounds pretty serious. Either way, if marco doesn't have some back-up plan, then I'd say he's a goner. Maybe someone can protect him...
Later wrote:
SmittyW wrote:
Ya know, if you were a big and thought I was fake claiming, you could have just shot me silently. That's kinda ur job
Now I'm somewhat glad you counterclaimed so I can ask you not to waste a bullet on me. Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise.
My theory: SmittyW decided to protect himself from any investigation and get all the heal from doctor, bodyguards so he could kill without any worries. He probably didn't even believe there was a vigilante in this game, or he actually plan somebody will counterclaim to kill him first and janitor wash his role.
"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."
I don't remember SmittyW confirmed his attack on Marco.
As for Marco he proved himself for being a vigilante.
What if mafia would play poorly in a game with so much reverse psychology? Nobody would believe they're mafia.
Please, can somebody else than Smitty give arguments for not being mafia?
!vote SmittyW

this

Also I think I have a new suspicion.
Jawapa, if you are an investigative-type-role then Onjit would give you the night results. This is kinda shielding yourself.
Please tell us your rolecard if you really are investigative, and then us why you would investigate zumza over luka507, kirby or other people you kept fingering at the whole d1&d2

!vote SmittyW

List of members:
2.SmittyW
3.Maxi123
4.Creature
5.Unau
6.Kirby
7.Kubapolish
8.Luka504
9.Different55
11.marcoantonimsantos
12.Bobithan
13.Processor
14.Evilbunny
15.Zumza
16.AlphaJon
17.JaWapa

Different55 · 2016-06-06 18:14:30

Reading back through the topic, I'm a little suspicious of Zumza, Kirby, Kuba, and Luka.
Zumza has hardly contributed to the game at all. Seriously, his posts are like 80% funposting. I mean there's a lot of it going around this game but Zumza here's pretty much always been in the middle of it. He's also been acting really sketchy all D2, especially around Smitty. It's obvious that he's fishing for something, but he doesn't seem in a hurry to say what. I think it's safe to say that he has a power role, and that he used it on Smitty. I have no idea why, I definitely think AlphaJon was right when he said that Smitty is a citizen who was trying to act as a meat shield for marco yesterday. Either that or he's a jester. Nothing else makes sense the way he was basically trying to get himself killed yesterday.

I just get the feeling Kirby is acting like he has no idea what he's doing so nobody pays attention to him. It's probably nothing, but he's also been super quick to vote JaWapa every time it came up. I don't think he's made a single serious post yet.

Kuba has only made 3 posts, none of which contribute even slightly to the game. Seems like he's doing the absolute bare minimum to not get kicked for inactivity. I don't like it.

Luka seems generally scummy to me. He's not as inactive as the others, and he doesn't funpost as much. But he seems to be trying to push the game in his own direction. Yesterday he seemed way too dead set on JaWapa absolutely NOT being mafia. His reasoning behind it (If JaWapa were mafia, then we would know because Onjit would step in for gamethrowing and blacklist him) seems way too flimsy. Why would Onjit step in if a mafia claimed their role? That would just be confirming the claim, which would do actual damage. It kind of reminds me about Calicara last game when she was so adamant about there being a GF role despite the entire town having thrown the idea out. That said, last game he was just as stubborn, it could be he's just that kind of guy. Even if it's just him and not scumminess, I wouldn't put too much into what he says. He was wrong about pretty much everyone he tried to have lynched last game.

Ultimately, I'm going to vote for Kubapolish. It's a toss up between him and Luka, but since Luka's acting more or less the same as he was last game I'm going to leave him alone for now.

!vote Kubapolish

mrjawapa · 2016-06-06 18:28:55

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

Also I think I have a new suspicion.
Jawapa, if you are an investigative-type-role then Onjit would give you the night results. This is kinda shielding yourself.
Please tell us your rolecard if you really are investigative, and then us why you would investigate zumza over luka507, kirby or other people you kept fingering at the whole d1&d2

I could investigate one person and find out if they had the ability to kill.

I investigated Zumza because I was torn between him and Kirby. I fell for kirby's dumb-trip at first, and didn't investigate him. I didn't get any message back from onjit, which means he either doesn't have the ability to kill, or it failed. You pick which one it is.

I didn't investigate luka because he defended me. If he was mafia, he would have thrown me under the bus.

realmaster42

Zumza · 2016-06-06 18:52:17

Different55 wrote:

Reading back through the topic, I'm a little suspicious of Zumza, Kirby, Kuba, and Luka.
Zumza has hardly contributed to the game at all. Seriously, his posts are like 80% funposting. I mean there's a lot of it going around this game but Zumza here's pretty much always been in the middle of it. He's also been acting really sketchy all D2, especially around Smitty. It's obvious that he's fishing for something, but he doesn't seem in a hurry to say what. I think it's safe to say that he has a power role, and that he used it on Smitty. I have no idea why, I definitely think AlphaJon was right when he said that Smitty is a citizen who was trying to act as a meat shield for marco yesterday. Either that or he's a jester. Nothing else makes sense the way he was basically trying to get himself killed yesterday.

I think just 10 of 25 posts are irrelevant. That is 100 * 10 / 25 which is 40%. You put double 80%?
Im always in the middle of game. This actually got me lynched or killed in previous mafias.
As for SmittyW, he is the person I want lynched. *the end
And if you really want to know my power role is: my logic.
Also if you just thought about the idea I investigated SmittyW and got a red result why not you just vote as I did?

realmaster42

Zumza · 2016-06-06 18:58:35

!stats

SmittyW: Zumza, Marco
Kirby: JaWapa, Creature
JaWapa: Kirby
Kubapolish: Different55

Zumza · 2016-06-06 19:39:43

JaWapa wrote:

How does this work again?
Not allowed to accuse anyone, not allowed to not accuse anyone, not allowed to be active, not allowed to not be active, not allowed to be aggressive, not allowed to be passive.... did I miss anything?

In my opinion you are allowed to do everything you want as far you stay consequent.

Zumza · 2016-06-06 19:42:45

SmittyW is our best lynch in my opinion.
I said it and I repeat it just go on and post arguments why Smitty isn't mafia or who is more suspicious than him.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-06 20:00:37

I'm assuming your goal is get smitty killed this game?

Kirby · 2016-06-06 20:05:03

My second vote on Jawapa wasn't really a joke despite the multiple !'s. I feel like him trying to get himself killed instead of going for a replacement is a bit suspicious.

Also as for me playing dumb, it's my first actual maf game Lol. I'm tryin. It's not playing dumb, it's just being dumb.

Zumza · 2016-06-06 20:05:55

JaWapa wrote:

I'm assuming your goal is get smitty killed this game?

Believe me if I could kill we wouldn't have this conversation.

Zumza · 2016-06-06 20:13:15

My goal is to make this conversation more dynamic. But this doesn't work I actually recommend Marco to shoot him.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-06 20:17:55

Zumza wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
I'm assuming your goal is get smitty killed this game?
Believe me if I could kill we wouldn't have this conversation.

!unvote
!vote zumza

Zumza · 2016-06-06 20:42:49

JaWapa wrote:

Zumza wrote:
JaWapa wrote:
I'm assuming your goal is get smitty killed this game?
Believe me if I could kill we wouldn't have this conversation.
!unvote
!vote zumza

You'r night result was that I'm not able to kill.
My affirmation above just confirmed you that.
The part where Im mafia is yet ambiguous for me.

Luka504 · 2016-06-06 20:50:08

Different55 wrote:

Luka seems generally scummy to me. He's not as inactive as the others, and he doesn't funpost as much. But he seems to be trying to push the game in his own direction. Yesterday he seemed way too dead set on JaWapa absolutely NOT being mafia.
Well sorry i didnt want to lynch a townie. My bad.
Dont get me wrong, if there was actual evidence against Jawapa i would have voted for him. But all you had was him ,,claiming mafia,, and being a ,,jerk,,. Congratz you lynched a townie for 2 reasons that dont even matter.
His reasoning behind it (If JaWapa were mafia, then we would know because Onjit would step in for gamethrowing and blacklist him) seems way too flimsy. Why would Onjit step in if a mafia claimed their role? That would just be confirming the claim, which would do actual damage. It kind of reminds me about Calicara last game when she was so adamant about there being a GF role despite the entire town having thrown the idea out. That said, last game he was just as stubborn, it could be he's just that kind of guy. Even if it's just him and not scumminess, I wouldn't put too much into what he says. He was wrong about pretty much everyone he tried to have lynched last game.
Ok so you are calling me out for defending Jawapa, yet you said a few things defending him yourself Different.
Just plex.
Ultimately, I'm going to vote for Kubapolish. It's a toss up between him and Luka, but since Luka's acting more or less the same as he was last game I'm going to leave him alone for now.
!vote Kubapolish
Ok so let me get this straight.
You want to lynch me for.....
Defending the Sheriff?
Yes thanks Different thats just perfect.
Lynch me im such obvious mafia.

TaskManager · 2016-06-06 20:53:54

most likely jawapa didnt receive results because he was roleblocked

Zumza wrote:

You'r night result was that I'm not able to kill.

who said and since when investigative role shows whether the target is capable of killing

Zumza wrote:

Also if you just thought about the idea I investigated SmittyW and got a red result why not you just vote as I did?

what do you mean

Luka504 · 2016-06-06 20:54:23

JaWapa wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Also I think I have a new suspicion.
Jawapa, if you are an investigative-type-role then Onjit would give you the night results. This is kinda shielding yourself.
Please tell us your rolecard if you really are investigative, and then us why you would investigate zumza over luka507, kirby or other people you kept fingering at the whole d1&d2
I could investigate one person and find out if they had the ability to kill.
I investigated Zumza because I was torn between him and Kirby. I fell for kirby's dumb-trip at first, and didn't investigate him. I didn't get any message back from onjit, which means he either doesn't have the ability to kill, or it failed. You pick which one it is.
I didn't investigate luka because he defended me. If he was mafia, he would have thrown me under the bus.

Ok after reading this post i realized something.
Jawapa isnt a regular Sheriff.
His rolecard says ,,Finding out if someone has the ability to kill.,, instead of ,,Finding out if someone is supicious.,,
So that means there MUST be another killing role that excludes the mafia.
So indeed we have a Serial Killer or some sort of killing evil role in this game.
Oh thays just peachy.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-06 20:58:36

@Zumza - your post confirmed that you were trying to target smitty.

@Luka - Good point.

I was only able to use mine once, so I'm assuming there's another invest role. Doesn't make sense to only be able to investigate one person in the game.

Zumza · 2016-06-06 21:00:02

That would make sense but I doubt we have neutral roles.

realmaster42 · 2016-06-06 21:00:26

Luka504 wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Also I think I have a new suspicion.
Jawapa, if you are an investigative-type-role then Onjit would give you the night results. This is kinda shielding yourself.
Please tell us your rolecard if you really are investigative, and then us why you would investigate zumza over luka507, kirby or other people you kept fingering at the whole d1&d2
I could investigate one person and find out if they had the ability to kill.
I investigated Zumza because I was torn between him and Kirby. I fell for kirby's dumb-trip at first, and didn't investigate him. I didn't get any message back from onjit, which means he either doesn't have the ability to kill, or it failed. You pick which one it is.
I didn't investigate luka because he defended me. If he was mafia, he would have thrown me under the bus.
Ok after reading this post i realized something.
Jawapa isnt a regular Sheriff.
His rolecard says ,,Finding out if someone has the ability to kill.,, instead of ,,Finding out if someone is supicious.,,
So that means there MUST be another killing role that excludes the mafia.
So indeed we have a Serial Killer or some sort of killing evil role in this game.
Oh thays just peachy.

what
what are you doing

Vigilantes exist m8
also Pyromaniac was shot by me and I clearly told out loud I was going to shoot him

plz
go back to page 1
yes, go back to page 1

now read everything from start until this post

Zumza · 2016-06-06 21:00:55

JaWapa wrote:

@Zumza - your post confirmed that you were trying to target smitty.

My vote confirmed that way earlier in D1.

realmaster42 · 2016-06-06 21:02:06

Zumza wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
@Zumza - your post confirmed that you were trying to target smitty.
My vote confirmed that way earlier in D1.

?

TaskManager · 2016-06-06 21:09:34

JaWapa wrote:

I was only able to use mine once, so I'm assuming there's another invest role.

oh
that explains a lot

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#276 2016-06-06 16:54:30

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#277 2016-06-06 17:34:20

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#278 2016-06-06 17:57:34

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#279 2016-06-06 18:12:15

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."

#280 2016-06-06 18:14:30

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#281 2016-06-06 18:28:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#282 2016-06-06 18:52:17

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#283 2016-06-06 18:58:35

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#284 2016-06-06 19:39:43

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#285 2016-06-06 19:42:45

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#286 2016-06-06 20:00:37

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#287 2016-06-06 20:05:03

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#288 2016-06-06 20:05:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#289 2016-06-06 20:13:15

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#290 2016-06-06 20:17:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#291 2016-06-06 20:42:49

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#292 2016-06-06 20:50:08

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#293 2016-06-06 20:53:54

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#294 2016-06-06 20:54:23

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#295 2016-06-06 20:58:36

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#296 2016-06-06 21:00:02

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#297 2016-06-06 21:00:26

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#298 2016-06-06 21:00:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#299 2016-06-06 21:02:06

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#300 2016-06-06 21:09:34

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

Board footer