Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2015-08-22 23:35:24

Processor
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,246

Protocol Changelog, Update 195

Since many people requested another protocol change log. Here it is:

https://gist.github.com/Yonom/cafc8edd9c14a72d0774

This time, I let you post replies to discuss things, but if you are having issues or you have questions, please create a separate topic. I won't be answering "What does variable X do?" questions here.

Regards,
Processor


I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.

Offline

#2 2015-08-25 08:13:16

capasha
Member
Joined: 2015-02-21
Posts: 4,066

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

Thanks processor for this update. //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

Offline

#3 2015-08-25 17:27:31

den3107
Member
From: Netherlands
Joined: 2015-04-24
Posts: 1,025

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

Can understand it's more logical to put new m-index-items in a specific order, yet it might make it a bit easier for bot makers to update their bots if new m-items would be appended at the end of the list.

For the rest it's a great update!
Keep up the good work.

Offline

#4 2015-08-25 22:41:44

AlphaJon
Member
From: Who knows
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,297

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

den3107 wrote:

Can understand it's more logical to put new m-index-items in a specific order, yet it might make it a bit easier for bot makers to update their bots if new m-items would be appended at the end of the list.

For the rest it's a great update!
Keep up the good work.

While it is perfectly possible, the data would become more and more unorganised as the game becomes updated this way. In the long run, programmers would lose more time searching for the data than they lose now by fixing some bits of code.

Offline

Wooted by:

#5 2015-08-25 23:50:54

SirJosh3917
Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
From: USA
Joined: 2015-04-05
Posts: 2,095

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

wait... so con.Send("init2"); is broken? replaced with "info2"?

Offline

#6 2015-08-27 03:21:45

capasha
Member
Joined: 2015-02-21
Posts: 4,066

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

ninjasupeatsninja wrote:

wait... so con.Send("init2"); is broken? replaced with "info2"?

Are you sure you can see between send and messages?

Offline

#7 2015-08-27 03:29:26

SirJosh3917
Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
From: USA
Joined: 2015-04-05
Posts: 2,095

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

capasha wrote:
ninjasupeatsninja wrote:

wait... so con.Send("init2"); is broken? replaced with "info2"?

Are you sure you can see between send and messages?

I'm not going to act like a genius, so here's my code.

				#region Init
				case "init":
					MyName = m[12].ToString();
					if (m.GetString(0) != MyName)
					{
						Disconnecting = true;
						con.Disconnect();
						MessageBox.Show("Sorry, please be owner to connect to world. The reason for this is spam issues", "NinjaBot");
					}
					WorldName = m.GetString(1);
					rot13 = Derot(m.GetString(5));
					Admins.Add(m[12].ToString());
					con.Send("init2");
					break;
				#endregion

I believe it's mostly my inexperience, since each player's name is 'nil', and by default when i case "add" a player, i set a blank player before i write in the current playear's data. example:

thingy i;
i.name = "nil";
i.id = 0;
i.name = m.getstring(1);
i.id = m.getint(0);

e.t.c

					Player e;
					e.name = m.GetString(1);
					e.id = m.GetInt(0);
					e.gold = 0;
					e.gbp = false;
					e.x = 0;
					e.y = 0;
					e.respawnx = 1;
					e.respawny = 1;
					e.gCommandsDo = new List<string>();
					List<Player> tmplist = Players;
					foreach (Player i in Players)
					{
						if (i.name == e.name)
						{
							tmplist.Remove(i);
						}
					}
					Players = tmplist;
					Players.Add(e);
					if (wmsg.Checked)
					{
						string add213 = "";
						if (pmwelcome.Checked)
						{
							add213 = "/pm " + gPlayer(m.GetInt(0)).name + " ";
						}
						BotSay(add213 + joinmsg.Text + " " + gPlayer(m.GetInt(0)).name + welcomeend.Text);
					}
					if (ejoin.Checked || EditPeople.Items.Contains(m.GetString(1).ToLower()))
					{
						con.Send("say", "/giveedit " + gPlayer(m.GetInt(0)).name);
					}
					if (Wooters.Contains(m.GetString(1)))
					{
						con.Send("say", "/giveedit " + m.GetString(1));
					}
					if ((nobomb.Checked && (m.GetString(1).ToLower().StartsWith("ninjabomb") || m.GetString(1).ToLower().StartsWith("ninjabot7"))) || (nobomb.Checked && m.GetString(1).ToLower().StartsWith("onbombbot")))
					{
						con.Send("say", "/kick " + m.GetString(1) + " No Ninjabot-Bombs allowed!");
					}
					if (!gjoin.Checked && m.GetString(1).ToLower().StartsWith("guest"))
					{
						con.Send("say", "/kick " + m.GetString(1) + " No Guests Allowed! Please Login!");
					}
					try
					{
						Ban findBn = findBan(m.GetString(1));
						if (m.GetString(1) == findBn.who)
						{
							con.Send("say", "/kick " + m.GetString(1) + " NinjaBot Ban: " + findBn.reason);
						}
					}
					catch { }
					try
					{
						AllPlayers.Items.Add(m.GetString(1));
					}
					catch { }
					try
					{
						Online.Add(m.GetString(1));
					}
					catch { }
					break;
				#endregion

"oh how i tried to catch my errors"

Offline

#8 2015-08-27 15:42:14, last edited by capasha (2015-08-27 17:51:57)

capasha
Member
Joined: 2015-02-21
Posts: 4,066

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

You don't need to add a "try catch" to catch errors...
And btw. Save on userid instead of username. You know people can change names now.

Offline

#9 2015-10-31 11:53:58

madiik
Member
From: floor above Yuuta
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 514

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

capasha wrote:

You don't need to add a "try catch" to catch errors...
And btw. Save on userid instead of username. You know people can change names now.

And you realize user id is dependant on when the player joined the world, right?


shh i have returned

Offline

#10 2015-10-31 14:37:48

Era
Member
From: ::1
Joined: 2015-05-06
Posts: 884

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

User id not user id, err i meen theres 2 id's one is session specific and the other is not.
both get send in init intitally, you just have to pick the right one //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

Offline

#11 2015-10-31 14:47:42

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,853

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

methinks he meant kong129849028758273 and simple87234587x987q234589-70987 and fb8971234597234762938475698723649578612348976 and such

Offline

#12 2016-01-31 17:42:59

XxFURYxX
Member
Joined: 2015-09-12
Posts: 5

Re: Protocol Changelog, Update 195

lol


( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLZ_ETRdXs_0yGFh-gIJxVVznMamUzK_enxgs2jvAolqFtVpcC
QCkDCFm.png
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Offline

Wooted by:
XxFURYxX1454258579579344

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732381925.3792 - Generated in 0.242 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.55 MiB (Peak: 1.72 MiB) ]