Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
pretty cool, nice quality. 8/10
Last edited by MaxDG/MXIII (Jul 24 2011 9:07:26 pm)
good, 7/10
Offline
7/10
Offline
6/10...
Offline
7/10
I'm not so much into logo designers, 7/10
And I would like some constructive criticism, not just 8/10 or 9.5/10, I want to learn what I can improve!
8/10
Quit asking for the stupid reasons you lose the points. Your points don't go down, they go up.
9/10 that tip for "fly" is awesome.
eh ee bars get boring 4/10
Offline
Still 10/10
8/10
Quit asking for the stupid reasons you lose the points. Your points don't go down, they go up.
I'm making my sigs by myself, so I want to know what I can improve.
A x/10 is kinda useless for me.
9/10 Interesting, hut iy's missing somthing.
Yours is around pixels over 300, I somehow like it, but it's a bit too simple 6/10, 7/10 if you resize it so it's under 300 pixels height.
Also what's missing? Anti-Awesomeness?
9/10
Same as before, 7/10
And you guys just LOVE ignoring me, don't you
8/10 because its kinda blury on both ends of the sig, either then that its good
Offline
You mean at the top and bottom ends or the left and right ends? And the BG or the text?
If you mean top and bottom and BG, it is so, because it looks cut off otherwise.
Anyway, still 10/10
9.5/10
Simple signature is simple.
6.5/10
Deal with it.
You mean at the top and bottom ends or the left and right ends? And the BG or the text?
If you mean top and bottom and BG, it is so, because it looks cut off otherwise.
Anyway, still 10/10
left and right ends and the text thats what
Offline
I'll see if I can fix it, thank you for the feedback, 10/10
nice sig, 10/10
Offline
1/10 "meh"
[ Started around 1732959333.6417 - Generated in 0.047 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.5 MiB (Peak: 1.66 MiB) ]