Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Squad wrote:Meredith wrote:I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You have crashed worlds before - that hurts.
I have crashed worlds, but not in the last 3 months.
You can't say you haven't been spamming
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Oh gawd. everybody has once spammed. it's kinda simple. without actual PROOF, and REASON TOLD TO THE PERSON it's a unfair ban. BAN is something huge. not just a DC. it's a ban. you CAN'T play this game anymore. payments have been LOST.
i guess even casual "spamming" is not a reason to BAN someone. if the owner is there he can /kick the person, if not WHO CARES.
hacking might be a good reason. but wait. the devs know meredith can do so. why didn't they took action before? why is it now wrong? and why had the ban to be issued at that time?..
Offline
Meredith wrote:Squad wrote:You have crashed worlds before - that hurts.
I have crashed worlds, but not in the last 3 months.
You can't say you haven't been spamming
Yes I can. Watch:
I haven't been spamming.
Master1 wrote:Meredith wrote:No proof of either, Julian and Brian both knew that Atilla and I could ban people, they did not ban us.
They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You don't harm people with it? Did we already forget when you banned Thwinkt about a few weeks ago? Pretty sure that harmed him a bit.
-
Edit* Also you say you weren't the one spamming, Surely you know who the spammer is then. If it's not you, who is it?
Last edited by Master1 (Sep 14 2014 6:05:03 pm)
Offline
Meredith wrote:Master1 wrote:They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You don't harm people with it? Did we already forget when you banned Thwinkt about a few weeks ago? Pretty sure that harmed him a bit.
-
Edit* Also you say you weren't the one spamming, Surely you know who the spammer is then. If it's not you, who is it?
Yes I know who it is, doesn't mean I have to share.
Thwinkt was shared and was crashing, it deserved a ban.
Thwinkt was shared?
Offline
I take you've been living under a drock
Squad wrote:Meredith wrote:I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You have crashed worlds before - that hurts.
I have crashed worlds, but not in the last 3 months.
Actually when you banned thwinkt about a month ago in DCLEVELS world, you crashed the world so you could ban him.
Master1 wrote:Meredith wrote:I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You don't harm people with it? Did we already forget when you banned Thwinkt about a few weeks ago? Pretty sure that harmed him a bit.
-
Edit* Also you say you weren't the one spamming, Surely you know who the spammer is then. If it's not you, who is it?
Yes I know who it is, doesn't mean I have to share.
Thwinkt was shared and was crashing, it deserved a ban.
If Thwinkt deserved a ban, it shouldn't have been given to him by you. Just because you think it deserves a ban, doesn't mean MrShoe, Mrvoid, or Brian think it deserves a ban. You had no right to do that anyways.
Offline
If Thwinkt deserved a ban, it shouldn't have been given to him by you. Just because you think it deserves a ban, doesn't mean MrShoe, Mrvoid, or Brian think it deserves a ban. You had no right to do that anyways.
The operation was to prevent mass-spamming and crashing because MrShoe and MrVoid neglected it.
I'm pretty sure they would all agree that mass-spamming and crashing is something that should be prevented.
*u stinky*
Offline
NEWS:
ULTRABASS has been deguardianed.
AYYYYY LMAO
Nice, 3 guardians left to deguard.
This is a false statement.
Offline
NEWS:
ULTRABASS has been deguardianed.
AYYYYY LMAO
I saw a world filled with profanity written towards specific people, and NVD just went there for a minute and left. I would /reportabuse, but it was an open world and had no idea who wrote it. I even pointed it out to him. Goodness.
Offline
this is extremely good news
wait wait wait pls explain why this happen?
Offline
being immature i guess
if you can read this....good for you
Offline
The better question is, who will be his replacement?
I'm sorry for him... To accept MrShoe invitation and then be the ungurdian its very annoyng.
As we can ungurd people by "/reportabsuse" should be same for unmod.
Last edited by The Doctor (Oct 29 2014 7:58:31 am)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
As far as I know it was Ultrabass' descision to quit the guardian program.
Hi.
Offline
As far as I know it was Ultrabass' descision to quit the guardian program.
I find that hard to believe, especially since the initial reaction was far worse than it is now (most of the hate has seemingly died down.) I was told that he was unmodded due to irresponsible behavior and bad decision making.
I don't know who your source is, but I believe they are inaccurate. They are probably lying to protect Ultrabass. Heck, I would lie too, because how embarrassing to be told you can't handle power. I don't know who your source is, but I'm 100% positive Ultrabass didn't just kindly step down. There had to be a reason.
Last edited by Calicara (Oct 29 2014 9:38:41 am)
I want to believe Helvi. Calicara you are bad How can you say/repeat this? Why?
It feeling like circus here!
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
"For those who wonder, I asked to get my guardian powers removed."
- Ultrabass
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
I want to believe Helvi. Calicara you are bad
How can you say/repeat this? Why?
It feeling like circus here!
No I am not bad. I'm skeptical. Also, my stance came from the mouth of another guardian. Helvi does not wish to reveal his source, which I will respect, but in some ways this makes his argument less credible.
@Skullz: Of course he would say that. He's probably trying to get off easy. It's fine with me, honestly I don't care. I'm just pointing out what I know. Politics are never this simple, even for a little site like EE.
Last edited by Calicara (Oct 29 2014 12:06:46 pm)
I don't think he would though, if MrShoe took away his powers. He said he didn't enjoy being a guardian because he got a lot of spam, which is understandable.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
I don't think he would though, if MrShoe took away his powers. He said he didn't enjoy being a guardian because he got a lot of spam, which is understandable.
Of course, but it's also a good excuse to be let off the hook for being irresponsible. I stand my theory, but whether I'm right or wrong doesn't matter. He's no longer a guardian, and that is that.
[ Started around 1739841724.1923 - Generated in 0.262 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.77 MiB (Peak: 2.02 MiB) ]