Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Well you avoided my question, again.
What was your question? That we shouldn't lynch town D1? We get information even from a townflip. Because we can see which people on the wagon seemed genuine and who seemed opportunistic. That's my opinion on the matter.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
The reason i'm scumreading you isn't just because of that. I've already stated multiple reasons why i scumread you. Let me go over them again Andy.
- You have no reads.
- You initially stated wanting to no lynch, but then suddenly said you were willing to follow "any wagon".
- Your statement about willingness to follow any wagon is completely against your purported ideology of not wanting to lynch town on day 1. (Something you stated later)
- You are overly defensive and seem more focused on your survival than solving.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
- Oh and when some really interesting **** happened earlier between me/Luka all you could muster was "This is smokescreen". And then didn't even explain in detail the reason you had behind making that post. Just some vague statements about "they could be scum or SK or something".
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Well, looks like i'm the only scum the game
I wonder what happened with my partner...
Idk what he's doing right now. Why don't you tell me who he is and why he isn't defending you so we can wrap this up early?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
And what's not to say you aren't SK. Why should just the fact that you don't have a likely partner make you town?
You haven't done anything townie this game, yet you are acting like scumreading you is completely absurd.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
I HAVE reads, I just don't want to say them.
- If I don't follow the wagon, then i'd look scummy for not cooperating with the "pro-town" strategy
- If I follow the wagon, then i'd look scummy for cooperating with something i'm againstI prefer the second choice because I thought you'd understand it, but looks like you play your own game.
Hmm, ok. At least that makes your position more understandable.
think towns should, like, try to stay alive because, like, the more towns, the more chance of winning, like, what towns want to, idk...
Yes, but as i've already stated. We can't just rely on a PR to solve the game for us. We need to do some solving ourselves too.
I don't understand why anyone would be against that.
Can you at least state your opinion on the Gabriell wagon?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Let's say we get real unlucky and cop get's shot tonight. What then? We've basically wasted a day phase and accomplished nothing other than a dead townie. Maybe two because this game also has a serial killer. Our only chance to get rid of scum is with lynching. Not just night actions.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Sure we must dig our own stuff, but look at the current state of the match:
- We are wagoning an inactive player for 'refusing to talk'
- I don't think thats townish neither scummy, its a clear demonstration that Gabriel don't want to be disturbed by early game hype
- He has created no links with other players, so neither a town or scum flip will grant more information than the flip itself
- That's why i'm against this D1 lynch. If the purpose is to grant information, than it will certainly fail
You're also forgetting the fact that the cop uses information from flips to actually find scum. He's meant to be leading us in the right direction. Not throw a dart into the huge name list and hope he get's lucky (which is even less likely when the pool for mistake is bigger because we don't lynch anyone). If he finds a town/scum and outs his read, how are we supposed to use that information to find either the scums partner or use that townclear to keep solving if we don't have any wagons to analyze? If the people whos'e roles are outed by the cop never voted or did anything to analyze because they never stated their reads (sounds familiar?)
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Andymakeer wrote:NorwegianboyEE wrote:- Oh and when some really interesting **** happened earlier between me/Luka all you could muster was "This is smokescreen". And then didn't even explain in detail the reason you had behind making that post. Just some vague statements about "they could be scum or SK or something".
Because that would out my reads lol
Dont trap me, please.I just wanted to say he’s flipping between having reads that he doesn’t want to share and not having reads, and I don’t get why he doesn’t want to share his reads.
Agreed, another reason why that particular point was egregious to me is because it is blatantly putting shade on both me and Luka (Implying we are scum distancing) but then, when asked to explain the reasoning behind his post and what he really thinks about the discussion he doesn't say anything. Which reads to me as if he wanted to shade, but doesn't actually want to take responsibility for what he said. Which is like textbook scum behaviour of trying to make other players look scummy in a malicious manner.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Andy is right, though. The only information we gain from lynching Gabe is his role card. He hasn't made any connections, or even reacted to anything. Despite what shadow said earlier, Gabe really is a throw away lynch.
Yeah, which is the point. The more completely null pointless slots in the game. The harder for the cop to actually correctly find and confirm scum.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Jesus, I can't keep up with this game anymore. There's so much back-and-forth and I have no idea what is being said or whom I should vote for.
I'm keeping up just fine.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Obviously i agree lynching an inactive is suboptimal as i’ve already stated. But it’s still better than no lynch because at least we get a chance to kill scum. And it lowers the lynch pool between the townie players and the scummy/null players.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Imagine having friends, unlike me who's been home for 3 months.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa dying inside
At least not all of us here smoke weed like i’ve found out players do on the mafia scum forums.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Feel kinda bad now, but the game doesn’t end with this.
Interesting that both kills were made on relatively low-presence slots. Which makes me curious if scum are in the active posters. I haven’t thought it over yet, that’s just my initial gut reaction.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Allen, did you have a scumread on Andy?
Yeah i’d like him to clarify that last post of his. Because i’m not entirely sure what they meant to say.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Da hecc is scum read? Is that like reading like a scum?
Just where I wanted to point out, that I knew that andy was a towner. I disagree about lynching him and yet ended the day.
It means you believe someone belongs to the mafia faction. And you clearly didn’t believe that initially so now i know.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Can we like, get luka off?
What does this mean?
Can you please try to make your sentences a bit more understandable for the English speaking audience?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
[ Started around 1740132658.3523 - Generated in 0.108 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.79 MiB (Peak: 2.07 MiB) ]