Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Offline
Offline
Offline
TaskManager wrote:imagine if you claimed cop and outed shadow immediately and not two real life days later
jesus **** christWhy would he out a maf when the town is in MyLo. All scum has to do is get us to lynch a townie and that's game over.
what do you mean
i assumed he's actual cop
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
I believe a Jawapa / Shadow combo is more likely.
The main things that make me believe Jawapa is scummy are coming from his D3 posts:
a) Lack of contribution, most of his posts are random accusations with nothing in depth
b) The posts that aren't random finger pointing, instead say something along the lines of "wow this sucks im having a stroke" which isn't really helpful either
c) He tried to start a wagon against by voting Zelda because of inactivity, that is when we can't afford lynching based on inactivity because we're in MyLo. Then he said he didn't want him lynched. What's the point of casting a vote then? What do you expect to gain by voting if you say you don't intend on lynching the guy?
Now more on why I think Jawapa/Shadow is more likely than Jawapa/Zelda:
Look at the interaction between Jawapa and Zelda via their isos. (Zelda your iso is 1 page this is so sad)
It has been mildly aggressive throughout the whole game. It's unlikely that they'd go as far as to fake it the entire game
Now, with Jawapa <-> Shadow it's more interesting:
Cases of Jawapa talking to/about Shadow are almost inexistent.
It only happened in early game. Just go to Jawapa's iso and do ctrl + f "shadow", you'll see
On Shadow's end it's different
Fence sitting/null reading:
On some level, I do agree with the claims against Jawapa. But, at the same time, the idea that his points and logic are flawed, giving room to the idea of him being scum, doesn't make sense to me, personally. Take last game for example, Jawapa was the Mason, but he claimed specific people as a given role, and others as another using the same kind of flawed logic that Norwegian is presenting. In general, I don't think the fact of his logic alone can give a good read on his position. Although, I don't disagree with the other points Norwegian brought up, like the absence of a vote on Peace, all of a sudden, and constant reinforcement of their suspicions of Daneeko and NoNK. But it's not really enough, in my opinion, to justify a wagon at the moment.
I don't have all too much to say about Jawapa, I don't have all that much suspicion against them, but I also don't have that much reason to believe they're town.
Defending a teammate?
NoNK wrote:Not reading your role card is a good strategy if you turn out to be an anti-town role, but if you're town, you're basically shooting us all in the foot by preventing us from being able to read you on day 1.
NorwegianboyEE wrote:Not reading your rolecard makes you useless since you’re neither on the side of town or scum. This means you are anti-town. That makes you our enemy since you’re either scum or lethargic town that isn’t willing to scumhunt. Best bet? Lynch the **** outta ya.
Not sure if y'all are being serious about this or not because most of what's been going on so far has been jokes. I'm pretty sure Jawapa isn't actually doing that. He said it publicly, right after NoNK's and Onjit's whole thing, so I'm pretty sure he just said it in response as a joke. Plus, if he really was doing it as a tactic, I doubt he would say it out loud that he's not reading his rolecard.
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1732292286.2203 - Generated in 0.071 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.72 MiB) ]