Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Please read the rules
1. Respect everyone, it's just a game, don't be a jerk.
2. Do not gamethrow. Play your role to win even if it seems dire, you never know what might happen.
3. Only discuss the game in this thread, or threads I assign to you.
4. Dead men tell no tales. Please use the graveyard thread if you have been eliminated.
5. Make all night actions via PM to me.
6. Don't use the mod text color please.
7. Try to post at least once every 24 hours.
8. Days will last 72 hours, or until a majority is reached, nights will last 24 hours.
9. If you break the rules I will be rather ornery.
10. Have fun!
Roles
Snags
3 of the 4 following roles are in the game.▼Chipolata▼Devon▼Kransky▼SoybeanSangas
5 of the 7 following roles are in the game.▼Barbie▼Tongs▼Onion▼Napkin▼Tomato Sauce▼Barbecue Sauce▼MustardLoaf
All 3 of the following roles are in the game.▼White Bread▼Sourdough▼Garlic Bread
Remaining Players (Randomised)
Zumza
2B55B5G TNG
TaskManager
MrJawapa
Freckleface
Kirby
Graveyard
NorwegianBoyEE [Tongs] - Killed Night 1
Schlog [???] - Replaced by Anatoly due to inactivity
Crybaby [Barbie] - Lynched Day 2
Mutantdevle [Devon] - Lynched Day 3
Anatoly [Soybean] - Lynched Day 4
Different55 [Sourdough] - Killed Night 4
:.|:;
Offline
yo everyone im finally back
ive read most of the stuff here
page 4 and second half of page 3 are literally garbage
Kirby's post about Freckle sounds reasonable to me
I won't vote yet cause we got 48 hours but if the conversation doesn't get any further I'll probably hop on the Freckle wagon
I find 25 slightly suspicious
Will post more in a few hours
P.S: Crybaby what is your reasoning for voting Kirby
Offline
Really don't like how 2B is sometimes stating the obvious in his posts
You could say he's new to the game but I'm not quite buying it
Trying to earn a town reputation by making quite obvious remarks in your posts is something a newbie would do imo
But hey maybe that's just me
I guess the vigi should do something tonight if we're going to lynch someone
Participating in the !endday wagon isn't necessarily a scum trait, some people genuinely don't care, NorwegianBoy proves that
That being said I do believe we gotta lynch people that will probably contribute the least
Since Frex replied right now I'm not going to claim he's not contributing
I believe we could give some attention to Schlog maybe
He's probably one of these that contribute the least
!lynch Schlog
Also Frex you're wrong, a majority has ti be reached or else lynch doesn't happen
Offline
!unvote
(this command is sufficient to remove my vote, right?)
(also are we obliged to !unvote before !voting somebody else?)
lets not put this at L-1, we still got time to let schlog reply
a hammer aint good, right
Offline
I think it does say a lot when I merely suggest schlog without even voting for him and the votes just pile on.
excuse me?? the only time you mentioned him was back on d1
i started this wagon
Offline
@mutant
I guess I've missed that one then
When I was writing that post I isolated you and searched for "schlog" and only found your D1 post #31
@2B55 why did you !unvote schlog
I think we should keep him at L-3 (or L-2) at least until he replies
Thus,
!vote Schlog
Offline
uhhhgh
amazing
!unvote
Zumza is slightly suspicious imo but I'll look into that more thoroughly later
aalanoty can you like actually read all of the posts in the thread instead of asking people to do it for you and make a tl;dr sort of thing
Besides, such tldr would be subjective and possibly missing details, you gotta read it all
Offline
whoa lol
i dont fully agree with 2b55's post but he made some good points
Then, Zumza decided to vote someone who is inactive. A person being inactive doesn’t mean he is a mafia. Zumza could have voted another person who is more suspicious, rather than voting an inactive person.
i voted schlog as well. i believe it was a necessary thing to do to get discussion going, because he was the most silent player and i didnt really see anyone that is objectively "more suspicious" when we have close to no information. i believe zumza simply jumped on the bandwagon there.
he even mentioned it in an earlier post:
I for myself, am a fan of lynching inactive players and lynch-hoping players, as they're more likely to be scum.
ironically, he turned out ot be a lynch-hopper himself
the posts that i find most suspicious are when he unvoted and then voted schlog again
and "You seem stressed" is a really really poor and baseless accusation, unless you're trying to get something out of Minimania by putting him under pressure
Offline
Offline
tbh im more inclined to lynching zumza than minimania
!lynch Zumza
but,
since we have to lynch someone eventually, i wont hesitate switching to minimania if there will be more votes on him with a few hours until the day end
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
SORRY FOR DOUBLE POST
ok this got really confusing and really quick
i wanted to put zumza at L-3, frex and anatoly kick in (frex ninjad me) and put it at L-1
this very much feels like an attempt to hammer the vote
Offline
TaskManager wrote:ill put my vote back 4-5 hours before the day ends
Right.
Sorry for the unnecessary drama!!
!unvote
Anyway, I'll vote in 3 hours. Bye.
um what the hell
why did you try to hammer zumza and suddenly took your vote back when it turned out that one more vote is needed?
Offline
Offline
Or the Napkin. Basically the doctor could heal the nightkill...
The Napkin sacrifices itself, so no
It could be a Sourdough preventing mafia from visiting his loaf teammate
I do agree that it is time to start sharing information
Onion and Sourdough should speak up
I'm also still willing to lynch Zumza, all the more so after minimania's town flip
Offline
What I’m scared is that the mafia will kill me if I reveal the information, or I become another main target of mafia
A Napkin role exists and a bbq sauce role exists
They claimed to have information. Now they are at death risk either way.
Literally everyone can claim that they have "the information"
It doesn't put them at risk until they actually say something of value
Offline
But as Anatoly said, there’s a chance that Mafia and Loaf works together this day
I believe he's just trying to rock the boat here
How does that follow? We didn't lynch Crybaby because of anything to do with Zumza (at least not really), we lynched him because between the two of them, there was a sudden and massive hammer attempt against <The Crybaby Alternative>. I guess that was somehow a coincidence. In any case, I don't think any sane mafia would bring one of their own less than an inch from death like that, so I'm personally more interested in going after the people responsible for the hammering.
That's a good point
I just didn't like how everyone suddenly forgot about Zumza after Crybaby was taken down, even though he was the second option
Anatoly trying to rock the boat with "mafia & loaf coop" and the hammer attempt yesterday do seem like fair scum traits tbh
I guess I'll follow for the time being
Again, I encourage people to keep the vote at L-3 or L-2 to prevent a hammer
!lynch Anatoly
Offline
Offline
Zumza wrote:This is crucial info:
If you are Tongs / Onion, tell us who you visited last night.
If you are Barbecue Sauce, and the person you checked died, tell us who visited them.
If you are Mustard, then if you found someone that is Mafia, say it out loud.What if BBQ sauce checked someone who didn’t die?
Did you just reveal yourself lmao
They shouldn't
BBQ should reveal if somebody else claimed and said they visited X on night Y and it doesn't match with BBQ's own investigation
For example:
Player1 claims Tongs and says they visited Player 2 on night 1
BBQ player checked Player 2 on Night 1 and saw that nobody visited P2 on that night. That means P1 lied and BBQ should speak up
Offline
Offline
jesus anaotly you sure love making confusing posts
TaskManager wasn't in the centre of attention the entire game, thus he modelled me in the last mafia I played and told the OP of the next game that I am always breaking the rules, that's why I roleblocked him!
1) what the hell is "modelled" in this context
2) so youre fakeclaiming because of a personal vendetta, nice
3) i wasnt roleblocked on either of nights
You may vote for me to get lynched, to see that I am the Onion
you already posted in the thread earlier this day, why did you not claim onion if you allegedly roleblocked the right person, until you got under pressure
Anatoly wrote:You may vote for me to get lynched, to see that I am the Onion, and lose another chance of winning the mafia, as of me voting, well that's
That was a long, painful, and fairly nonsensical read, but right at the end here. Did you just out yourself as the Soybean?
You are the Soybean.
Not the most appealing, but it’s nice to have an extra option for those that want it.
You are aligned with the Snags. Your teammates are X and Y. You can talk with them here: <link>.
At the beginning of the game, you will be told all unassigned roles, allowing you to more confidently assume a false identity.
Each night, choose a player and send them a private message (via me)
Your team will win when the Snags have a majority of the population.
LOL
10/10
Day 1
TaskManager visited Mutantdevle
can confirm
Day 2
Mutantdevle and Anatoly visited Kirby
10/10
interesting
Offline
i guess we keep him at L-3 for the time being then..?
actually
!unvote
this way at L-3 mafia wont be able to hammer their teammate to make him shutu p
unless anatoly votes for himself idk if thats possible in the current game
thanks to 2BBQ55's info we know that kirby is town/loaf
2bbq55 is proven town, basically
there's more to tell but i'll let that wait until later in the day
i need to observe some people here
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1732407454.8523 - Generated in 0.167 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.9 MiB (Peak: 2.25 MiB) ]