Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

Vitalijus · 2018-09-03 23:03:51

Instead of moving the whole NPC around I've made him move his eyes only:

And here's a version of him moving his eyes and eyebrows:

Since Jet needs all or none I've made some other NPCs to move their eyes too:

▼Computer NPC

▼Frog NPC

I personally support only Bruce eye following, because it would take up too much space for every NPC. Such a small detail that others might not even notice shouldn't take that much space (unless you guys code it in instead of using different frame for few pixels)

Onjit

Luka504 · 2018-09-03 23:14:27

Azurepudding wrote:

it doesn't mean that, and if you meant that you coulda said that. i know exactly where I am, and I caught you good.
you later explained why but you still posted a reason-free post. and I countered your later listed reason and still waiting.

Not gonna lie, I find it really annoying when you have to assert your intellectual superiority every single time you argue with someone.

Raphe9000, Minimania

TaskManager · 2018-09-03 23:25:43

Vitalijus wrote:

Instead of moving the whole NPC around I've made him move his eyes only:
https://i.imgur.com/LWGU62m.png
And here's a version of him moving his eyes and eyebrows:
https://i.imgur.com/ZvwyNv1.png
Since Jet needs all or none I've made some other NPCs to move their eyes too:
▼Computer NPC
https://i.imgur.com/gVK0yY1.png
▼Frog NPC
https://i.imgur.com/059IpR2.png
I didn't make it look up because if it looks up + middle it looks like a mad frog
I personally support only Bruce eye following, because it would take up too much space for every NPC. Such a small detail that others might not even notice shouldn't take that much space (unless you guys code it in instead of using different frame for few pixels)

bruce
nice
frog
hmm interesting
but pc
what the hell its a static object dude
and it doesnt have eyes
???

Raphe9000 · 2018-09-03 23:26:51

Only eye following for all I think is the best thing to do if anything at all.

Jet wrote:

“i caught you good” explains your intentions enough here
honestly **** off before this becomes a quote tower

Ya, that's exclusively Fanboy smileys from t-shirts thread!

Anatoly wrote:

OP (Pro - Suggestion): 11 woots (+ 1 poster)
Jet (Anti - Suggestion): 1 woot (+ 1 poster)
12 : 2
we won.

With my previous statement, I guess it's ironic when I say this: Oh no not this again.

I don't think that's fair, since when you agree with something, it's self explanatory. "I agree with what this person said, we share the same belief and opinion on this issue"
But, when you disagree with something, it's not so easy since you can disagree with someone for multiple reasons. You should at the very least explain why you disagree with something since it's impossible for others to know why you disagreed.

Not necessarily. I have many beliefs where I agree with someone for totally different reasons. I know I agree with the suggestion but not the suggester (from how he is acting to the reason he wants it implemented to how he wants it implemented).

Edit:

TaskManager wrote:

bruce
nice
frog
hmm interesting
but pc
what the hell its a static object dude
and it doesnt have eyes
???

IDK according to conspiracy theorists the PC should have a following webcam instead.

TaskManager · 2018-09-03 23:29:30

Raphe9000 wrote:

IDK according to conspiracy theorists the PC should have a following webcam instead.

they're all liars
computers are just inanimate metal objects with wires
and the pcnpc doesnt even have a webcam smh

Raphe9000 · 2018-09-03 23:35:39

TaskManager wrote:

Raphe9000 wrote:
IDK according to conspiracy theorists the PC should have a following webcam instead.
they're all liars
computers are just inanimate metal objects with wires
and the pcnpc doesnt even have a webcam smh

But in EE, we live in an age where there are living robots of solid gold.

TaskManager · 2018-09-03 23:36:10

Raphe9000 wrote:

TaskManager wrote:
Raphe9000 wrote:
IDK according to conspiracy theorists the PC should have a following webcam instead.
they're all liars
computers are just inanimate metal objects with wires
and the pcnpc doesnt even have a webcam smh
But in EE, we live in an age where there are living robots of solid gold.

no
im a taskmanager.exe and i know better

Raphe9000 · 2018-09-03 23:38:46

no
im a taskmanager.exe and i know better

▼CONTENT WARNING

Funny thing too is we also have holograms, a robot npc, and a sci-fi pack.

TaskManager · 2018-09-03 23:57:07

Raphe9000 wrote:

no
im a taskmanager.exe and i know better
▼CONTENT WARNING
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/aw635 … YxQfThrIy0
Funny thing too is we also have holograms, a robot npc, and a sci-fi pack.

Holograms and robots are fine to move, a simple desktop computer isn't

drunkbnu

Raphe9000 · 2018-09-03 23:59:35

Well, AI are computers. Maybe this is an AI program.

azurepudding · 2018-09-04 02:28:12

Jet wrote:

“i caught you good” explains your intentions enough here
honestly **** off before this becomes a quote tower

You said I was lost.. which explains nothing. You didn't have a counter so you just attacked back with that. it's not me being lost if you can't counter my counter. at least concede how that was ironic of you, bashing others for not having "competent" posts while literally beginning with a one word post.

eh, w/e man, Bruce not flipping means too much to you. and bruce flipping doesn't mean enough for me to enter another pointless argument, at least not for more than 3 or so posts.

Luka504 wrote:

Azurepudding wrote:
it doesn't mean that, and if you meant that you coulda said that. i know exactly where I am, and I caught you good.
you later explained why but you still posted a reason-free post. and I countered your later listed reason and still waiting.
Not gonna lie, I find it really annoying when you have to assert your intellectual superiority every single time you argue with someone.

this wasn't so much about me, but wanting to pull him off his pedestal. i saw someone being ironic while also putting others down so i had to point it out, what can I say.

Jet wrote:

thanks for being the only one here to provide a competent answer instead of the “SO WHAT” card

Jet wrote:

no

"i caught you" makes me intellectually superior apparently and is a huge crime, and if it does, i guess it's also bad to be intellectually superior too.

HeyNK · 2018-09-04 03:04:42

Anatoly wrote:

Guys let's stop all the dramatic.
OP (Pro - Suggestion): 11 woots (+ 1 poster)
Jet (Anti - Suggestion): 1 woot (+ 1 poster)
12 : 2
we won.
But we this won't be added due to one reason:
EE Staff

no

daneeko · 2018-09-04 13:31:04

Jet wrote:

“i caught you good” explains your intentions enough here
honestly **** off before this becomes a quote tower

no

azurepudding

Anatoly · 2018-09-04 15:50:40

Before this changes into a fight ill better save you all from bans.

RailMat, Freckleface, azurepudding, N1KF, SirJosh3917

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#26 2018-09-03 23:03:51

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#27 2018-09-03 23:14:27, last edited by Luka504 (2018-09-03 23:16:41)

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#28 2018-09-03 23:25:43

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#29 2018-09-03 23:26:51, last edited by Raphe9000 (2018-09-03 23:28:02)

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#30 2018-09-03 23:29:30

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#31 2018-09-03 23:35:39

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#32 2018-09-03 23:36:10

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#33 2018-09-03 23:38:46

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#34 2018-09-03 23:57:07

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#35 2018-09-03 23:59:35

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#36 2018-09-04 02:28:12, last edited by azurepudding (2018-09-04 02:49:13)

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#37 2018-09-04 03:04:42

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#38 2018-09-04 13:31:04

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

#39 2018-09-04 15:50:40

Re: Let Bruce NPC be able to "look at you".

Board footer