Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
In this game, you play as a vampire who wishes to gain enough blood points to become the ultimate vampire!
There are 3 ways you can gain points:
In a single post, you cannot perform more than 1 of these actions at once. If you do not specify an attacking or defending action, you will automatically comment.
You may also not post twice within the last 5 posts. This means if your post is post number 67, then you cannot post again until post number 72. This means 4 other players would have posted before you do.
Posts that break this rule will not be counted and, instead, you will lose 10% of your points (rounded up).
Editing is disabled however if you are somehow able to edit your posts then please do not do this. Edited posts will always be considered as a comment.
I reserve the right to change these rules at any time and enforce them immediately or on previous posts if I choose to do so. I will always mention if a rule has been changed.
If you find a flaw in the rules that could allow for potentially game-breaking actions, please inform me through PM. I decide what is considered game-breaking. If you are ever unsure about whether something is allowed, then ask me first (through PM). Failure to do so may cause me to consider your post a violation of the rules resulting in your post not being counted and being docked 10% of your points (rounded up).
The first player to 1002 points wins the game.
Offline
I reserve the right to change these rules at any time and enforce them immediately on all players. This includes reevaluating everyone's points, if the new rule changes the score mechanism. I will always mention if a rule has been changed.
FTFY
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Not exactly. I won't be recalculating the entire thread each time. I'll have the rule take effect from the post that I see fit, whether that be my own post or the post that caused the new rules to be implemented. I don't think any new rules that could potentially be added would require an entire recount anyway though.
That isn't fair since the same rule will not affect all players who did the same thing the same way.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Y'know, for someone who's pedantic with the way I write the rules you really don't seem familiar with the changes.
Usually changes are highlighted.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I'm not too sure what you don't understand? You had 83 points. Onjit stole 50% = 42 leaving you on 41 and Onjit on 64. You then stole 50% from Onjit which is 32 so now you have 73 points and Onjit has 32.
For some reason I assumed Onjit had at least 42 points before attack me.
Onjit, sorry for attacking you, you needed that points more than me.
attack railmat
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Cras elementum. Fusce suscipit libero eget elit. Praesent in mauris eu tortor porttitor accumsan. Nullam sapien sem, ornare ac, nonummy non, lobortis a enim. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo attack xfrogmantular43 minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Fusce consectetuer risus a nunc. Maecenas ipsum velit, consectetuer eu lobortis ut, dictum at dui. Integer malesuada. Pellentesque arcu. Nullam lectus justo, vulputate eget mollis sed, tempor sed magna. Aliquam erat volutpat. In dapibus augue non sapien. Mauris dolor felis, sagittis at, luctus sed, aliquam non, tellus. Curabitur bibendum justo non orci. Etiam neque. Nulla non arcu lacinia neque faucibus fringilla. Praesent id justo in neque elementum ultrices.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
xfrogman43 stole 89 points from RailMat!
Onjit tried to attack peace but failed. peace steals 5 points from Onjit!. peace is no longer defending.
John stole 120 points from xfrogman43!
Both me and AlphaJon attacked xfrogman... https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 99#p703699
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Zumza wrote:mutantdevle wrote:xfrogman43 stole 89 points from RailMat!
Onjit tried to attack peace but failed. peace steals 5 points from Onjit!. peace is no longer defending.
John stole 120 points from xfrogman43!
Both me and AlphaJon attacked xfrogman... https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 99#p703699
mutantdevle wrote:You may only attack 1 player per post and you must clearly name the specific person you want to attack.
Personally, I'd say that writing a huge paragraph in another language and randomly injecting "attack xfrogman43" into it does not constitute 'clearly naming the specific person you want to attack'. I did Google translate your paragraph when initially seeing your post. The context of the attack was this: "For your free time, when our power of choice to choose the most effective and when you offer any hindrance to that which is well pleasing in his attack xfrogmantular43 are enabled to do the less, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided." Taking into account that the translation is obviously not 100% accurate, I concluded that the sentence was talking about an attack on frogman43. Hence, this post was not considered an attack and defaulted to a comment. If you do want to perform an attack, then in the future clearly state who you are attacking instead of trying to exploit the rules.
The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Zumza wrote:The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
Let's be honest, you put your attack in the middle of a Lorem Ipsum, which is known for being a dummy text, and as such is rarely read.
Imo you basically hid the attack so you could then complain about mutantdevle not finding itThat said, mutantdevle is still partly at fault for allowing commands to be buried in walls of text without him checking them (as opposed to mafia votes for example, where the votes have to be bolded and/or put by themselves on a separate line)
Mutandevle claims he actually noticed it, and just refused to take my action.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
The first 5 players have 500 to 550 points. Never seen so much social equality before.
I also believe AlphaJon is overzealous with those posts, I suggest you should kill him.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732237037.8923 - Generated in 0.113 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.67 MiB (Peak: 1.89 MiB) ]