Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
In this game, you play as a vampire who wishes to gain enough blood points to become the ultimate vampire!
There are 3 ways you can gain points:
In a single post, you cannot perform more than 1 of these actions at once. If you do not specify an attacking or defending action, you will automatically comment.
You may also not post twice within the last 5 posts. This means if your post is post number 67, then you cannot post again until post number 62. This means 4 other players would have posted before you do.
Everytime you break this rule, you will lose 10% of your points (rounded up).
Offline
Attack Zumza
Nope you need to wait till 4 posts have passed zumza.
Give me back my points.
I don't think that's correct. I may comment every 5 posts, but I believe I can take any actions in the meanwhile. Therefore I just got 50 points now, stole your points, and also in defend mode.
Best of luck,
Zumza
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Hah! Don't get overly smug there.
What you just did cannot possibly be permissible. You can't just attack someone and then immediately go into defense mode. That just allows you to get free hits on people and be perfectly safe and is very abusable. The rules might need to be better worded though, now that I am reading them again. Nonetheless I'm sure Devlin won't allow you to get away with this. And if he doesn't do anything, well I may need to try your trick out sometime if you know what I mean.
don't be a plagiarist
attack mutantdevular
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Zumza wrote:defend
you can't defend because you already posted in the last post
I need Devlin explain the rules better. Because as I understand from the OP, what I do is perfectly within the game rules.
YOU MAY ONLY COMMENT ONCE EVERY 5 POSTS.
Comment literally anything to gain points.
+50
thanks
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I reprove this.
The rules weren't clear enough. (as previous said not only by me) And my actions were made according to them. Applying rules retroactively is abusing.
I demand a recount or 0 points.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
The rules were clear enough, you just tried to abuse the wording. [...]
Zumza [...] understood that the wording of the rules had slight leeway for interpretation, but instead of playing it safe, he continued doing what multiple told him he couldn't do as a gamble for getting as many points as possible. That gamble did not pay off.
[...] Your demands will not be met.
I'm going to repeat myself:
The previous rules as worded were not obstructing my actions. People were assuming that they can't do it.
I played by concrete, not assumed rules. The previous rules permitted my actions.
The 3 types of actions: attack, defend, comment were definite split. The condition was not to comment again within a 5 posts frame.
YOU MAY ONLY COMMENT ONCE EVERY 5 POSTS.
Comment literally anything to gain points.
(https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 37#p701837)
I'd argue that I've been gambling, I've read the rules carefully point to point, perhaps more so than others.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
[ Started around 1732559434.3157 - Generated in 0.089 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.6 MiB (Peak: 1.8 MiB) ]