Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#501 2016-06-22 23:46:48

Evilbunny
Member
From: The bottom of my heart
Joined: 2015-02-25
Posts: 1,276

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Calling it: Kirby killed Onjit for being inactive.


Evilbunny (in cursive)

Offline

#502 2016-06-22 23:47:02

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby


This is a false statement.

Offline

#503 2016-06-22 23:47:31

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Different55 wrote:
Creature wrote:

Kubapolish
Do you still have daycop abilities? It'd be good if you could daycop Luka504.

IIRC he said those were 2 shot and he burned through both of them with you and someone else I can't remember.

Are we still clueless on what "guilty" vs "not guilty" means?

Unau


This is a false statement.

Offline

Wooted by:

#504 2016-06-22 23:49:06

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

If we can't decide on someone to lynch today, we lynch Different55.
If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.
If we want to start lynching inactives, we lynch N1KF.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#505 2016-06-22 23:51:06

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

N1KF
Did anything happen to you at night?


This is a false statement.

Offline

#506 2016-06-22 23:51:31

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby

I love how you avoided every reason to why someone can or couldnt have visited Onjit.


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#507 2016-06-22 23:53:29

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

If we can't decide on someone to lynch today, we lynch Different55.
If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.
If we want to start lynching inactives, we lynch N1KF.

1. Trusts different yet wants him dead.
2. Why is hummerz scummy again?
3. We got lucky that an inactive player was a Serial Killer. I think we should stop while we're ahead.


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#508 2016-06-22 23:54:13

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,468

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.

hmm why hummerz?


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

Wooted by:

#509 2016-06-22 23:54:42

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Because all his posts seemed very opportunistic.


This is a false statement.

Offline

Wooted by:

#510 2016-06-23 00:02:05

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

I think there's a bit of a flaw in your logic Creature

Creature wrote:

1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby

Luka504 wrote:

Also i was roleblocked last night.


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#511 2016-06-23 00:07:07

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,864

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

maxi123 wrote:

no last words? //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/neutral

Different55 wrote:

I don't know about you guys but I'm feeling pretty good that we just happened to nab a mafiascrub. One mafia down, two to go and we've only lost a single townie on D3.

isnt that a neutral

So let me get these teams straight. OP says "no edit revolution" so they're like the mafia? And instead of being a regular editor, Onjit was the "townie" a Code User. The Haunter, kaleb, was the neutral.
So we have a deficit, right?

Creature wrote:

If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.

Hey man, I asked you why I was such a great target last time you did this. And you never really answered. Then, there's those questions Different's been asking you about why you're BSing over some of your lynch suggestions.

Luka504 wrote:

3. We got lucky that an inactive player was a Serial Killer. I think we should stop while we're ahead.

@Creature, @Luka
Was it lucky? I mean, luck exists, but the chance is larger that we really have quite a few third-party users outside the no-edit revolution. The suggestion I was backing, which you, Creature, find so revolting, did sniff out a third-party user. Are you a 3rd partier? :o

Creature wrote:

Because all his posts seemed very opportunistic.

*refreshes page*
You summed your impression of me up in one word. I'd appreciate more so I could have something to work with. Thinking off the top of my head, yes. My lynch targets are probably ample and wide ranging, but they aren't without reasoning. Repeatedly I've argued that our inactive accounts hold us back. And, no one's explained why not. So, logically, I try to make up for that with ample support. If I'm missing your point, please make it clearer.

perhaps, what you're implying (in your one word) is that I didn't care who we lynched, so long as we did lynch. Sorry, but I'm new here. When someone explains that a no-lynch negatively affects us, I'll avoid a no-lynch.

Offline

#512 2016-06-23 00:11:02

Unau
Member
From: over there
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 499

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

i can read dead people


unau_sig

thanks koya

Offline

#513 2016-06-23 00:12:08

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,468

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

Because all his posts seemed very opportunistic.

good reason
!vote hummerz5
just kidding
!unvote
give actual reasons not a 1-liner


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#514 2016-06-23 00:17:09

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Unau wrote:

i can read dead people

....
3a8ae23b54e44e0789d181f76d700415.png
Im sorry i had to


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

Wooted by: (3)

#515 2016-06-23 00:20:08

Evilbunny
Member
From: The bottom of my heart
Joined: 2015-02-25
Posts: 1,276

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Similar

Unau you can talk to dead people? What does that mean...


Evilbunny (in cursive)

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#516 2016-06-23 00:21:00

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Luka504 wrote:

I think there's a bit of a flaw in your logic Creature

Creature wrote:

1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby

Luka504 wrote:

Also i was roleblocked last night.

Then consider yourself striked out from the list.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#517 2016-06-23 00:23:31

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

!vote N1KF

Then let's try to apply some pressure.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#518 2016-06-23 00:23:51

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

In Game 9 N1KF at least was posting something, in this game N1KF is posting absolutely nothing.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#519 2016-06-23 00:25:44

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"


This is a false statement.

Offline

#520 2016-06-23 00:29:28

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,864

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"

Alright, then at least admit you have nothing to argue with. Your own argument opposes you. In essence, you're saying that having reasons to defend oneself is useless, because they will be made up.

Swap those around, and accusing someone is useless, because your accusation could be made up. I think this is why people go "oh you read scum" or "townish" as opposed to trying to go for some reasoned kill that doesn't exist.

Offline

Wooted by:

#521 2016-06-23 00:34:54

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,577

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"

... You mean like you've been doing with every question thrown at you the whole game?


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#522 2016-06-23 00:35:29

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,468

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"

well if town follows bandwagons mindlessly it makes it easy for mafia to push a mislynch no?


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

#523 2016-06-23 00:37:48

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

maxi123 wrote:
Creature wrote:

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"

well if town follows bandwagons mindlessly it makes it easy for mafia to push a mislynch no?

You don't have to automatically follow me, but you just can't go to any case and say "there's no explanation so i am not voting" unless you're townreading the accusee. If you're really town and not lazy, you would check that user and actually analyse yourself before deciding whether to vote.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#524 2016-06-23 00:39:08

Evilbunny
Member
From: The bottom of my heart
Joined: 2015-02-25
Posts: 1,276

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Creature wrote:

but you just can't go to any case and say "there's no explanation so i am not voting" unless you're townreading the accusee.

yes we can, we don't all have the same play style


Evilbunny (in cursive)

Offline

Wooted by:

#525 2016-06-23 00:39:40

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,864

Re: EE Mafia 1 - Game Thread [CODE USERS WIN!]

Different55 wrote:
Creature wrote:

Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"

... You mean like you've been doing with every question thrown at you the whole game?

It's interesting the number of times you've brought that up and seemingly the number of times we've ignored them (Not just Creature, I mean) Perhaps we should place a little more emphasis on this.

Offline

Evilbunny1468109062611924

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1748732291.9626 - Generated in 0.077 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.18 MiB) ]