Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Calling it: Kirby killed Onjit for being inactive.
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby
This is a false statement.
Offline
Creature wrote:Kubapolish
Do you still have daycop abilities? It'd be good if you could daycop Luka504.IIRC he said those were 2 shot and he burned through both of them with you and someone else I can't remember.
Are we still clueless on what "guilty" vs "not guilty" means?
Unau
This is a false statement.
Offline
If we can't decide on someone to lynch today, we lynch Different55.
If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.
If we want to start lynching inactives, we lynch N1KF.
This is a false statement.
Offline
N1KF
Did anything happen to you at night?
This is a false statement.
Offline
1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby
I love how you avoided every reason to why someone can or couldnt have visited Onjit.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
If we can't decide on someone to lynch today, we lynch Different55.
If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.
If we want to start lynching inactives, we lynch N1KF.
1. Trusts different yet wants him dead.
2. Why is hummerz scummy again?
3. We got lucky that an inactive player was a Serial Killer. I think we should stop while we're ahead.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
Offline
Because all his posts seemed very opportunistic.
This is a false statement.
Offline
I think there's a bit of a flaw in your logic Creature
1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - Kirby
Also i was roleblocked last night.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
no last words?
Different55 wrote:I don't know about you guys but I'm feeling pretty good that we just happened to nab a mafiascrub. One mafia down, two to go and we've only lost a single townie on D3.
isnt that a neutral
So let me get these teams straight. OP says "no edit revolution" so they're like the mafia? And instead of being a regular editor, Onjit was the "townie" a Code User. The Haunter, kaleb, was the neutral.
So we have a deficit, right?
If we want to try to lynch a real scummy player, we lynch hummerz5.
Hey man, I asked you why I was such a great target last time you did this. And you never really answered. Then, there's those questions Different's been asking you about why you're BSing over some of your lynch suggestions.
3. We got lucky that an inactive player was a Serial Killer. I think we should stop while we're ahead.
@Creature, @Luka
Was it lucky? I mean, luck exists, but the chance is larger that we really have quite a few third-party users outside the no-edit revolution. The suggestion I was backing, which you, Creature, find so revolting, did sniff out a third-party user. Are you a 3rd partier? :o
Because all his posts seemed very opportunistic.
*refreshes page*
You summed your impression of me up in one word. I'd appreciate more so I could have something to work with. Thinking off the top of my head, yes. My lynch targets are probably ample and wide ranging, but they aren't without reasoning. Repeatedly I've argued that our inactive accounts hold us back. And, no one's explained why not. So, logically, I try to make up for that with ample support. If I'm missing your point, please make it clearer.
perhaps, what you're implying (in your one word) is that I didn't care who we lynched, so long as we did lynch. Sorry, but I'm new here. When someone explains that a no-lynch negatively affects us, I'll avoid a no-lynch.
Offline
i can read dead people
thanks koya
Offline
Offline
Unau you can talk to dead people? What does that mean...
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
I think there's a bit of a flaw in your logic Creature
Creature wrote:1. - RhazzleFrazzle
2. - AlphaJon juliocesarsantos AlphaJon
4. - maxi123
5. - Zumza
6. - Unau
7. - hummerz5
8. - Kubapolish
9. - N1KF
10. - Creature
12. - Different55
13. - Evilbunny
14. - Luka504
15. - KirbyLuka504 wrote:Also i was roleblocked last night.
Then consider yourself striked out from the list.
This is a false statement.
Offline
!vote N1KF
Then let's try to apply some pressure.
This is a false statement.
Offline
In Game 9 N1KF at least was posting something, in this game N1KF is posting absolutely nothing.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
This is a false statement.
Offline
Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
Alright, then at least admit you have nothing to argue with. Your own argument opposes you. In essence, you're saying that having reasons to defend oneself is useless, because they will be made up.
Swap those around, and accusing someone is useless, because your accusation could be made up. I think this is why people go "oh you read scum" or "townish" as opposed to trying to go for some reasoned kill that doesn't exist.
Offline
Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
... You mean like you've been doing with every question thrown at you the whole game?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
well if town follows bandwagons mindlessly it makes it easy for mafia to push a mislynch no?
Offline
Creature wrote:Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
well if town follows bandwagons mindlessly it makes it easy for mafia to push a mislynch no?
You don't have to automatically follow me, but you just can't go to any case and say "there's no explanation so i am not voting" unless you're townreading the accusee. If you're really town and not lazy, you would check that user and actually analyse yourself before deciding whether to vote.
This is a false statement.
Offline
but you just can't go to any case and say "there's no explanation so i am not voting" unless you're townreading the accusee.
yes we can, we don't all have the same play style
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
Creature wrote:Also, you can't just go to a case and act like "oh you should explain better", this is what makes scum hunting way harder. Scum are going to ask for explanation so they can answer with something made up and then say "oh i answered everything"
... You mean like you've been doing with every question thrown at you the whole game?
It's interesting the number of times you've brought that up and seemingly the number of times we've ignored them (Not just Creature, I mean) Perhaps we should place a little more emphasis on this.
Offline
[ Started around 1748732291.9626 - Generated in 0.077 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.18 MiB) ]