Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#26 Before February 2015

JadElClemens
Member
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,559

Re: Interesting Statistics

You started again 1bigsmile1

Epic.


4RNmJ.png

I hate tall signatures.

Offline

#27 Before February 2015

coolio
Guest

Re: Interesting Statistics

Pyromaniac wrote:

I hate both of these minis... lol this is a coolio thread

EXCU-USE ME?!!!

#28 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Interesting Statistics

MIHB wrote:

0.000001% CHANCE TO COMPLETE THREE IN A ROW WITHOUT TIMING(1,000,000 TRIES).

Office did 4 in a row the other day.   What are your odds for that?

Actually, for this one it took me 74 tries to complete it.

Wow, I have no idea how I got that number. You have a 0.05% chance to complete 4 in a row.

(1/74) x 4 = 2/37 = 0.05405405405405

I suppose I might have accidentally done it "to the power of 4" instead of "times 4"

And squadfs, your friend is Jesus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a question: how many New Years and Christmas bricks are there? I think I counted... 2 trees... 2 snow... 2 fence... 5 lights?

72 bricks without the Christmas/New Years. 83 total?

Oh, lol, I could just click on someone's profile and count //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

Now accepting requests for minigames and other requested numbers!

Like, how many players are there, how many worlds are there, all that fun stuff.

Last edited by Tako (May 18 2011 4:18:30 pm)


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#29 Before February 2015

Shinabi
Guest

Re: Interesting Statistics

This one is quite easy, but I don't have time (and portals) to be able to do the test. What is the maximum distance you can travel (in blocks) by running into a portal at max speed (From one side, to the other WITH arrows). Thanks!

#30 Before February 2015

Shift
Guest

Re: Interesting Statistics

TakoMan02 wrote:
MIHB wrote:

0.000001% CHANCE TO COMPLETE THREE IN A ROW WITHOUT TIMING(1,000,000 TRIES).

Office did 4 in a row the other day.   What are your odds for that?

Actually, for this one it took me 74 tries to complete it.

Wow, I have no idea how I got that number. You have a 0.05% chance to complete 4 in a row.

(1/74) x 4 = 2/37 = 0.05405405405405

I suppose I might have accidentally done it "to the power of 4" instead of "times 4"

Umm, I'm pretty sure you were supposed to do it to the power of four, rather than multiply it by four. In fact, I'm completely sure.

#31 Before February 2015

bobofawesome
Guest

Re: Interesting Statistics

I have not seen a low ceiling one in my life ill go and make one to test.

#32 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Interesting Statistics

shift wrote:
TakoMan02 wrote:
MIHB wrote:

Office did 4 in a row the other day.   What are your odds for that?

Actually, for this one it took me 74 tries to complete it.

Wow, I have no idea how I got that number. You have a 0.05% chance to complete 4 in a row.

(1/74) x 4 = 2/37 = 0.05405405405405

I suppose I might have accidentally done it "to the power of 4" instead of "times 4"

Umm, I'm pretty sure you were supposed to do it to the power of four, rather than multiply it by four. In fact, I'm completely sure.

(1/74)^4 = 0.0000000333482555660906

I forgot what my middle school teachers drilled into my brain: always use "to the power of x" when figuring probability in fractions.

Shinabi, the answer to that question is: the fastest you can go, with the use of portals, is across a wide world without touching the ground, even through < gravity. See supadorf's cannon in the level creation topic.

I will be hard to time this intense speed, very hard. It requires something more then just holding a stopwatch or opening an online stopwatch in a new tab. It takes about a second to move across a wide world.

Last edited by Tako (May 20 2011 4:22:55 pm)


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

Tako142386812993303

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1714992739.6859 - Generated in 0.031 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.45 MiB (Peak: 1.56 MiB) ]