Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
???? i didnt say it twice -.- that was my first post here? they would - amazing art bcuz its "too hard"
if they dont - we do because thatll get the good levels on a seperate list
Last edited by Muftwin (May 19 2011 7:26:56 pm)
???? i didnt say it twice -.- that was my first post here? they would - amazing art bcuz its "too hard"
if they dont - we do because thatll get the good levels on a seperate list
Sorry, that was muffin. Muffin, muftwin, what's the difference, really.
[EDIT] If it's a noob, they'll + it because it has good art.
Another flaw: What if the level gets redesigned? Should you be able to rate the new level? And how would EE know a new level from the level with large edits?
Last edited by Tako (May 19 2011 8:09:38 pm)
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
I think there could be more choices that just like/dislike. Like having a toggle for stairs, repetitive, art, easy hard, pro and so on. Then have a set limit like 50% so that if 50% or more of the votes call a level stairs it's listed as stairs. (The easy/medium/pro toggle would send it to the category that gets the most votes.) The search feature should of course be able to narrow down levels depending on whether you set it to show or hide pro levels, stair levels and so forth.
I only use the lobby for bosses, I play most levels from the forum.
Offline
Muftwin wrote:???? i didnt say it twice -.- that was my first post here? they would - amazing art bcuz its "too hard"
if they dont - we do because thatll get the good levels on a seperate list
Sorry, that was muffin. Muffin, muftwin, what's the difference, really.
[EDIT] If it's a noob, they'll + it because it has good art.
Another flaw: What if the level gets redesigned? Should you be able to rate the new level? And how would EE know a new level from the level with large edits?
well the difference is we're different people
good point on the redesigned levels i dont really have an answer to that....especially since technicly bosses get redesigned a lot
TakoMan02 wrote:Muftwin wrote:???? i didnt say it twice -.- that was my first post here? they would - amazing art bcuz its "too hard"
if they dont - we do because thatll get the good levels on a seperate list
Sorry, that was muffin. Muffin, muftwin, what's the difference, really.
[EDIT] If it's a noob, they'll + it because it has good art.
Another flaw: What if the level gets redesigned? Should you be able to rate the new level? And how would EE know a new level from the level with large edits?
well the difference is we're different people
good point on the redesigned levels i dont really have an answer to that....especially since technicly bosses get redesigned a lot
Your names are only 2 letter apart and your sigs are almost exactly the same.
And I have the solution: The owner can reset the votes. If the level sucks, gets thumbs down a million times, he resets, it will be thumbs down all over again. If the level sucks, he resets, and redesigns, people like it, it gets thumbs up.
Last edited by Tako (May 20 2011 6:57:49 am)
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
lol @ BEE.
but yeah im nubby too, my minigame ideas are horrible and my art sucks. but i am so in love with this game
Yea, I only keep the lobby tab open to go adding energy to the things and maybe eventually find Universe Boss or some EX levels. If not, I go n' play on the forums' levels.
Popularity = more noobs.
meh i can see how you could mix us up now
im not sure about the details anymore but im sure it would be great if we could get all the non-noobs to - levels they like instead of + we'd have a list of actually good levels to pick from
What about this? I think this is a pretty good solution.
What if levels could be rated? :/
Offline
The plauge of the Noobs must be eradicated from this world. To long have the sovereign people been haunted by the noobs. It was the noobs that cruxified Jesus. It was the noobs that brought the Black Death to Europe. It was the noobs that founded the Soviet Union. It was the noobs that attacked World Trade Center.
Jelly, they are jelly.
Yes. TGT, you're like, EE's hero. You and TI:1 go troll bad levels. I used to hate trolls, but they're awesome. WhyTF would you troll a genuinely good level? You wouldn't, and never will be able to. Trolls = 1. Noobs = -2
I hate tall signatures.
Offline
You know how to be pro, young JadElClemens.
I think before you go walking into a bad world in the lobby there should be the user of the person who built it next to the game title. Won't help much but least if it's a bad place you can never go into any of the builders places again.
Man, I used to remember when stairs were everything and they were a lot of fun. Now, they're just...
...washed up...
A conversation I recently had with another EE-loving kid at my school:
"Do you remember stairs?"
"What?"
"On EE. Those gates that look like a staircase, and you're trying to get to the top?"
"Oh yeah, those were so much fun."
*delay*
"You sad, sad child."
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
TheGreenTroll wrote:The plauge of the Noobs must be eradicated from this world. To long have the sovereign people been haunted by the noobs. It was the noobs that cruxified Jesus. It was the noobs that brought the Black Death to Europe. It was the noobs that founded the Soviet Union. It was the noobs that attacked World Trade Center.
Jelly, they are jelly.
Yes. TGT, you're like, EE's hero. You and TI:1 go troll bad levels. I used to hate trolls, but they're awesome. WhyTF would you troll a genuinely good level? You wouldn't, and never will be able to. Trolls = 1. Noobs = -2
Same. I used to be all anti-troll. Now I support trolling and troll noob levels whenever I can.
Offline
Didn't we all troll, get an account and stop trolling, then start trolling again? Seems like the way things go.
[ Started around 1715786344.6671 - Generated in 0.057 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.71 MiB) ]