Undertale Mafia game thread

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-04-24 22:03:06

1. All forum rules apply, however spam and multi-posting rules are more lenient. So long as your posts are relevant to the game it shouldn't be an issue, but don't push it.

2. Do not post in this thread unless you are alive in the game. All posts made by dead players and people not in the game will be deleted. No exceptions.

3. You may not edit or delete your posts. This function will be disabled in this game.

4. Do not quote someone else's post and edit for misleading purposes.

5. You must stay active and contribute to discussion to stay in the game. If you stay inactive too long, you will be prodded for inactivity and replaced if you don't respond to the prod within 24 hours. Earning more than one prod will result in you being replaced or modkilled.

6. Do not quote, copy paste, or screenshot any message sent by the game moderator for any reason. Paraphrasing is allowed, such as saying your night result or what your role is, but don't copy paste an entire role pm.

7. Do not gamethrow. Gamethrowing is defined as actively working against your role/faction's win condition, and is dealt with on a case by case basis.

8. As soon as a majority is reached, it counts as the day being over. The moderator may not be there to lock the thread immediately so do not post after majority is reached.

9. You may not talk about the game with other players through any means not approved by the moderator. This includes dead players. No exceptions.

10. Remember that this is just a game. If I see any form of harassment that may warrant a replacement or modkill.

11. If any player breaks any of these rules please private message me on the forums and I will deal with it. Do not use the forums report feature to report someone breaking one of the game rules unless they are also breaking a forum rule.

12. The moderator's word is final. If I say not to do something it means don't do it. If you have an issue then it's best to save until the end of the game as to not interfere with the game.

If you have any questions you can pm me or post in this thread, however keep in mind that questions relating to the current game I will likely not be able to answer, so only ask about game mechanics.

TaskManager, AlphaJon

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 07:30:00

Bobithan wrote:

hey can we like, skip the day 1 funposting somehow? lets start some actual productive conversation, like a wild accusation against smitty for pretending he doesn't know the mafia count. whats up with that smitty??

Ok.....
Now what?
Day 1 is too early too do anything or get scum reads unless Chara posts something dumb. (like i did in that game >_>)
Though who knows.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 11:54:12

Does this game involve you people funposting
Oh it does.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 11:59:12

AlphaJon wrote:

Btw what are your characters? Mine is Toriel and I am a Pacifist

Smells like role fishing.
Delicious.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 12:04:46

True, but through personality you can decipher what their abilities are.
My rolecard describes my character.... So.....
Explain pls/.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 12:12:38

AlphaJon wrote:

That would be too easy, if you could link character to role. And having a character would be useless if you can't do anything with it except show it on death.

Alpha my rolecard with its ability does indeed describe what my character can do.
Meaning that if someone were to say their role, you can link possible abilities to that character.
MEANING the mafia will get a leg up.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 12:20:52

AlphaJon wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
Alpha my rolecard with its ability does indeed describe what my character can do.
Meaning that if someone were to say their role, you can link possible abilities to that character.
MEANING the mafia will get a leg up.
Ok, if you can tell me what my role is, you win this argument.
But don't forget this:
RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
Note that flavor will not allow you to solve the game. Making arguments about someone's alignment based on flavor won't work.

Kden good point.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 21:41:08

Creature wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
Bobithan wrote:
hey can we like, skip the day 1 funposting somehow? lets start some actual productive conversation, like a wild accusation against smitty for pretending he doesn't know the mafia count. whats up with that smitty??
Ok.....
Now what?
Day 1 is too early too do anything or get scum reads unless Chara posts something dumb. (like i did in that game >_>)
Though who knows.
Scumslip? How do you know the mafia is Chara?

Oh sorry i just thought
a relentless psychopathic murderer
would be a mafia member.

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 21:43:12

SmittyW wrote:

Creature wrote:
Luka504 wrote:
Bobithan wrote:
hey can we like, skip the day 1 funposting somehow? lets start some actual productive conversation, like a wild accusation against smitty for pretending he doesn't know the mafia count. whats up with that smitty??
Ok.....
Now what?
Day 1 is too early too do anything or get scum reads unless Chara posts something dumb. (like i did in that game >_>)
Though who knows.
Scumslip? How do you know the mafia is Chara?
You are reading too far into this. It's been established that characters =/= alignment.
I am curious to which game you are referring to Luka. What did you mean by
Luka504 wrote:
(like i did in that game >_>)

The game where i tried to push a n1kf bandwagon without any wheels
Ended badly (for me).

Luka504 · 2016-04-26 22:29:57

JaWapa wrote:

!vote AlphaJon

Why this vote?

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 05:21:35

Jawapa wrote:

Well, I'm a little hesitant with this vote because he seemed like actually wanted to be lynched. Almost like he was a jester. He even voted for himself.
I really just wanted to see what he would say/do. Despite everything else, there was already two (?) votes against him, and it be a random lynch, but I think it's a good one tongue

Jawapa wrote:

To my understanding, there are no neutrals. And because setting a vote and observing his reaction could have confirmed my suspicion.

OBJECTION!
First off all do you even realise what Jesters are? Neutral roles. Yet you say there are no neutrals! Which one is it?

Jawapa wrote:

Well, I'm a little hesitant with this vote because he seemed like actually wanted to be lynched. Almost like he was a jester. He even voted for himself.
I really just wanted to see what he would say/do. Despite everything else, there was already two (?) votes against him, and it be a random lynch, but I think it's a good one tongue

This makes me feel weird. You think he might be a Jester, yet you vote for him? Why?
Also you acknowledge it being a random lynch yet you jump on it. BOTH votes were clearly fun posting, nothing more. Honestly this seems like a mafia push lynch on someone innocent.

I propose the following: We lynch Jawapa. No need to quickhammer, considering what might pop up, but we should lynch Jawapa if we have no other leads.
- If he flips geno, Alpha is a confirmed innocent.
- If he flips pacifist, Alpha will be somewhat scummy.

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 05:22:28

Oh right forgot this part:
!vote Jawapa

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 08:01:50

@AlphaJon
If he is indeed scum, him trying to push a bandwagon on you seems like a mafia pushing for a mislynch AKA on an innocent. I highly doubt he would vote for you if you were his teammate, especcaly with the lack of evidence on you.
If he is a pacifist it could mean he thinks you are behaving differentely or odd, though it doesnt have to be. Though considering theres nothing wrong with your posts im most likely wrong.
Sorry bout dat.

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 17:57:53

▼big

Creature wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
I propose the following: We lynch Jawapa. No need to quickhammer, considering what might pop up, but we should lynch Jawapa if we have no other leads.
- If he flips geno, Alpha is a confirmed innocent.
- If he flips pacifist, Alpha will be somewhat scummy.
This post worries me the most. He sounds like a scum who wants to get two mislynches in a row by saying something like "lets lynch jawapa, if he flips town, lets lynch alphajon"

Luka504 wrote:

@AlphaJon
If he is indeed scum, him trying to push a bandwagon on you seems like a mafia pushing for a mislynch AKA on an innocent. I highly doubt he would vote for you if you were his teammate, especcaly with the lack of evidence on you.
If he is a pacifist it could mean he thinks you are behaving differentely or odd, though it doesnt have to be. Though considering theres nothing wrong with your posts im most likely wrong.
Sorry bout dat.

Wow if you accidentaly word something ,,wrong,, you are obvs scum. (sarcasm)
I made a mistake geez.

Creature wrote:

Currently seeing:
{AlphaJon, Zumza}
{Kaslai, Onjit}
{maxi123, SmittyW}
{Bimps, marcoantonimsantos, Pyromaniac}
{Bobithan, Evilbunny}
{Calicara, JaWapa}
{Luka504}
Legend:
Strong town reads
Townleans
Smaller townleans
Null
Worried about
Scumleans
Strong scum read

Why am i on the bottom of the list?
I can understand that you might place me in a lower scumish behavior.
Also what makes calicara scummy again?

Creature wrote:

Calicara has posted like two posts that sound like "hey lets not discuss like we did in mafia 7", this is not her usual play.
JaWapa leaving an empty vote worries me too, later he states the reason was because of his self-vote. I noticed he justified it was to question AlphaJon, which is a valid reason, but I am still seeing some differences in JaWapa's play.

Defending a scum. Sure i said it myself defending is not proof of scum.....
But this isnt like you. Last two games i NEVER saw you defending anyone, and you were innocent those games.
Change in behavior. Legit.

SmittyW wrote:

!vote Luka504
Because of what Creature & gang said
or is that not a valid reason
if you are trying to convince me luka is bad but then I can't agree with you because it's considered sheeping then why bother trying to convince me at all

Gang? Creature is the only one who accused me.
Again i feel akward here. You cant agree with the fact that im ,,evil,, yet you voted for me. What?

Creature wrote:

"Luka is acting weird on JaWapa vs Alpha, but I think this is his play"

Well maybe you could know how i played if I WASNT LYNCHED ALMOST INSTANTLY in the past two games.

Honestly you people seem to be using the same tactic as previous game.
Lynching me without any real evidence. So far Jawapa is pretty scummy.
So is Creature (gonna explain deeper in a min)
SmittyW seems to be bandwagoning even though he was prety town neutral-ish pastt games.

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 19:20:02

Orange is the new font.

Luka504 wrote:

Wow if you accidentaly word something ,,wrong,, you are obvs scum. (sarcasm)I made a mistake geez.

I am not scum reading you for guessing Chara is in the scum team, I am scum reading you for the way you interacted with the AlphaJon vs Jawapa.
Im not talking about the Chara incident, im talking about (jawapa being a paci = alpha being scum) being wrong. Yeah that is pretty dumb.

Luka504 wrote:

Why am i on the bottom of the list?
I can understand that you might place me in a lower scumish behavior.
Also what makes calicara scummy again?

I already stated, maybe you should start reading.

I am suspecting Calicara for the way she's avoiding an argument with me, not sure if she's frustated or doesn't want to be lynched, but I am currently leaning on the latter.
And? Honestly you two seem pretty much on opposite sides. Still this doesnt seem that worthy to put her in scale 2 of ,,scumminess,,

Luka504 wrote:

Defending a scum. Sure i said it myself defending is not proof of scum.....
But this isnt like you. Last two games i NEVER saw you defending anyone, and you were innocent those games.
Change in behavior. Legit.

Where am I defending JaWapa? What makes you so sure JaWapa is scum? You can't say I am defending a scum out of nowhere.

Creature wrote:

His attack on AlphaJon was pretty weak, but it's his vote, he based off something.
I noticed he justified it was to question AlphaJon, which is a valid reason

Luka504 wrote:

Well maybe you could know how i played if I WASNT LYNCHED ALMOST INSTANTLY in the past two games.

Calm down then.
NEVAR

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 19:35:05

Creature wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
I propose the following: We lynch Jawapa. No need to quickhammer, considering what might pop up, but we should lynch Jawapa if we have no other leads.
- If he flips geno, Alpha is a confirmed innocent.
- If he flips pacifist, Alpha will be somewhat scummy.
This post worries me the most. He sounds like a scum who wants to get two mislynches in a row by saying something like "lets lynch jawapa, if he flips town, lets lynch alphajon"

Ok i re read your accusations.
This is actuly a solid claim. But think about this a bit more logically.
First of all i want to address i stated multiple times i was wrong about jawapa paci = scum alpha.
Though the part of jawapa geno = inno alpha is still standing.
See, Jawapa, out of the blue voted for Alpha and his defence doesnt explain why he did it.
But think about this scenario:
- Both Jawapa and Alpha are genos.
Why would Jawapa, while Alpha seemed pretty townish, vote for him? Seems a bit illogical for a mafia member to vote for another mafia member no?
The most logical scenario would be that Jawapa is a mafia member who saw a chance of starting a bandwagon on someone innocent, in this case Alpha. That would make Alpha a confirmed townie.
Sure you can argue that Jawapa might be an innocent randomly accusing people.
But that is still illogical. Why would a townie vote for another (presumed) townie? Onjit voted for him purely out of a joke, but Jawapa didnt joke, since if he did he would of placed that in his defence.
Im still standing by my claim that Jawapa is a geno.

Luka504 · 2016-04-27 20:00:05

AlphaJon wrote:

^ This doesn't make sense.
Luka504 wrote:
Though the part of jawapa geno = inno alpha is still standing.
No. You can't make a link between him and me just because of a vote. I still encourage you to give SEPARATE reads, though.
>_> ugh
Luka504 wrote:
- Both Jawapa and Alpha are genos.
Why would Jawapa, while Alpha seemed pretty townish, vote for him? Seems a bit illogical for a mafia member to vote for another mafia member no?
Because if we were both Genocides, that would be a (kinda bad) way to clear one of us from the scuminess.
Exactly! Considering the lack of experience Jawapa has he couldnt have possibly made up that elaborate plan. (Its still dumb anyways)
Luka504 wrote:
The most logical scenario would be that Jawapa is a mafia member who saw a chance of starting a bandwagon on someone innocent, in this case Alpha.
You don't start a wagon with a post consisting solely of a !vote
That depends on the situation. For example if person A votes for person B who he defended, he will be pretty scummy.
Luka504 wrote:
Why would a townie vote for another (presumed) townie?
Because townies don't know who the other townies are?
True, but Alpha what have YOU posted that was scummy for him to vote for you?
The rest I think I already explained.

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 05:48:33

JaWapa wrote:

Onjit wrote:
JaWapa wrote:
!unvote
!vote luka
what is your reasoning for this vote
Well, you see, I read him. And readings are never wrong. You see, Luka is maf, Cali is maf, Rhaz is maf. Kaslai is kinda maf, but not completely. Creature and you are sorta town. Everyone else is totally 100% legit town.

I don't know if I really have a reason for this. I really just want to see how people react, and see if they slip up and say something that is incriminating. I think this is better than having another two, or three, days of poop posting.

Not enof contradictions.

Well, you see, I read him.

Great! Mind showing me what you found?

And readings are never wrong.

Keep telling yourself that.

Rhaz is maf.

Rhaz is the host..... lol

Kaslai is kinda maf, but not completely.

May i ask why?

I don't know if I really have a reason for this.

Ok so you are going around blindly accusing people, but the people you acused are the people who accused you?
Coincedence? Doubt it.

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 12:11:51

luka504 wrote:

Well, you see, I read him.
Great! Mind showing me what you found?
Kaslai is kinda maf, but not completely.
May i ask why

?

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 13:57:08

@Pyro
Im not in that list and im offended.
@Zumza
Defending Jawapa. Hm okey ( Doubt )
Writing the list.

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 14:13:47

(People who arent mentioned havent posted enough so i can read them)
Innocent-ish
-Bobithan
Seems pretty town neutral like, pretty much like previous games.
-Calicara
More offensive than last time, but her posts make sense and are pretty scum-free.
-SmittyW
Just like previous games he is pretty neutral.
-AlphaJon
Considering Jawapas dire state i believe Alpha to be innocent.
-Onjit
Pretty much like before, funposting a lot, while makin some serious posts here and der.
Neutral
-Kaslai
Cant exactly say much for him.
-Maxi123
Seems OK i guess.
SUSPICIOSO
-Creature
Really aggresive here and stated a few things that defended Jawapa, but when i call him out he starts attacking Jawapa? ,,People change,,
-Jawapa
The biggest scum here. Barely contributed to the topic, makes random accusations and jumps on bandwagons without even stating why. My vote stays on him.
-Zumza
Not as scummy as the other two, but him defending Jawapa is making me feel akward-er. Gonna keep an eye on him.

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 22:01:48

JaWapa wrote:

I'm looking forward to beating my head off the wall.
Why? Because so far this game is poop.

Thats great and all, but mind anwsering my questions?
Y'know? The ones i asked twice?
What were your amazing reads so you had a reason to vote for me?
Why is Kaslai suspicious to you?

Luka504 · 2016-04-28 22:07:59

Evilbunny wrote:

!vote Luka504
until he learns how to read

Please clarify?
What am i missing here...

Luka504 · 2016-04-29 15:40:31

Been a while.
Vote count:

JaWapa-Luka504, Calicara, Zumza, Onjit (4)

Luka504-SmittyW, Bimps, Evilbunny (3)

marcoantonimsantos-AlphaJon, Creature (2)

8 votes needed for majority.

Luka504 · 2016-04-29 17:01:09

Creature wrote:

I am starting to change my mind about maxi123, his recent posts look like fluff.

Show pls.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2016-04-24 22:03:06

Undertale Mafia game thread

#2 2016-04-26 07:30:00

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#3 2016-04-26 11:54:12

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#4 2016-04-26 11:59:12

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#5 2016-04-26 12:04:46

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#6 2016-04-26 12:12:38

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#7 2016-04-26 12:20:52

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#8 2016-04-26 21:41:08

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#9 2016-04-26 21:43:12

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#10 2016-04-26 22:29:57

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#11 2016-04-27 05:21:35

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#12 2016-04-27 05:22:28

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#13 2016-04-27 08:01:50

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#14 2016-04-27 17:57:53

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#15 2016-04-27 19:20:02

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#16 2016-04-27 19:35:05

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#17 2016-04-27 20:00:05

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#18 2016-04-28 05:48:33

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#19 2016-04-28 12:11:51

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#20 2016-04-28 13:57:08

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#21 2016-04-28 14:13:47

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#22 2016-04-28 22:01:48

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#23 2016-04-28 22:07:59

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#24 2016-04-29 15:40:31

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

#25 2016-04-29 17:01:09

Re: Undertale Mafia game thread

Board footer