Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Heh, I wasn't asking for a nolynch, re-read my post:
Let's say we nolynch today and have everyone do their night actions, if someone got leads tomorrow, we lynch the person we got evidence against them, if nobody got leads, then we're not lynching. Whoever has no action at all will just someone hoping something good happens. What are the fun on this?
This is a false statement.
Offline
AlphaJon - I already stated, I know he elaborates his posts more and he's more passive when he's mafia. He's currently pushing his reads and questioning them.
Zumza - Well, I don't know his scum game, but he's playing like he did game 6: Working with his reads.
Bobithan - What do I have to say? He's being discussive in these arguments we had, which was an improvement from his last game.
Pyromaniac - His initial stubborness looks like a good tell. Even though he didn't post much, his posts seemed coming from town trying to contribute, rather than scum making excuses.
Onjit - I am seeing differences in his current play and his scum play. His reads are not sheeped and humouristic aimy, he's actually saying what he feels about his reads (townlean, scumlean) instead of fence-sitting. Even though his timezone is pretty different, he seems to be trying a bit.
maxi123 - Well, I don't have much to say, when he was scum, I just town read him and he didn't get to defend. He's defending himself a bit and is being more vocal, so I am giving him a very thin town lean.
Evilbunny - I know he's the savior of the readlist posters and all, but he's still not much townleany. Where he went after his speech? I'd poke him with a stick tomorrow.
SmittyW - He usually posts more vote counts and discuss about game stats and widely scum read players. I am barely seeing any of these in action, but rather some weak attacks.
marcoantonimsantos - I am not liking his reads and it seemed like forced to cover the "marco is not fitting his meta".
Calicara - Still not liking her. She usually doesn't start attacking unless someone attacks her. She's potentially aligned with Luka504, basically she defended him over my attack and gave him a neutral read.
Kaslai - Yeah, I am also wondering, where is his town-self defending AlphaJon from evil Processor?
Bimps - I am not even sure what happened with him, he didn't flake out like this when he was scum, neither as town. However, I know Bimps doesn't just come with "I think JaWapa is just a nubby town".
Luka504 - It's hard to read him, but if you disconsider his meta, we have a pretty scummy player here. If JaWapa flips scum, he'll get some town points as I believe his scum-self tries to avoid his scumbuddies. However, if JaWapa flips town, I'd be worried for the fact that after the pressure on him was gone, he went to secure JaWapa's lynch.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Please provide evidence of my so called 'alignment' with Luka. I was genuinely confused as to why we were voting him.
You attacked me for attacking Luka504 and you put him a neutral read.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Creature wrote:If there's actually a cop, I expect mafia to have deceptive roles. What wouldn't make me a good frame target?
With yesterday's drama I would have more expected a framer to be on Jawapa.
Well, I believe the framer had to choose between JaWapa and me. If I were you, I wouldn't discard the possibility of framer choosing me over JaWapa.
This is a false statement.
Offline
wtf though
I received my role results at the end of the night, as much I doubt you would claim this as mafia, it's literally impossible to have a cop who instantly receives results, unless Rhazh secretly made this game ultra bastard.
!vote JaWapa
I know you want to lynch me first, but trust me, it's better lynching scum than lynching an innocent and then lynch the scum. JaWapa's instant cop claim is impossible in a non-bastard game.
This is a false statement.
Offline
[ Started around 1734501622.3607 - Generated in 0.074 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.58 MiB (Peak: 1.78 MiB) ]