Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 01:17:21

Calicara wrote:

Gamemonger wrote:
I'm doing the same as most of the posts on the 1st day are pretty much spam. Don't see how it's too susp.
Also this.

Can i just say that this day hasn't been spam, so who cares if the first day usually is. WE've actually been having a pretty good discussion.

Bobithan, Onjit

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 15:24:27

Zumza wrote:

After 45 minutes(when I disconnected)

The point is that you responded right away with an unrelated post, and then responded later with a BARELY related post. Ive said this multiple times.

Zumza wrote:

I did answer Anak question.
Anak still says that I didn't response... I ask her / him to give me a list of questions but she / he refused that.
Anak is very stubborn without any reasons and that blinds her / his activity.
I just consider that being open minded its crucial to win this game. A quality Anak didn't prove yet.

Its not Anak's responsibility to help clear you. You should be reading back to see what you missed. You're being very difficult. Ive said the same thing to you like 200 times so I'm done arguing

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 16:39:27

Thats what I said

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 19:57:47

Anak wrote:

So, I have no idea why you feel the need to answer with cryptic messages, and not only to me. You said that you dodged my questions bc I could answer them myself? Celarly not if I'm asking you.

This is my problem with Zumza as well. He refuses to answer questions directly, and instead tries to be clever (???) by writing around the question and being deliberately cryptic.

Creature- It appears that your list has changed considerably. Care to tell us why?

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 19:59:31

Also Rhaz

Where is the updated vote list lol

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 21:55:57

Am I the only one noticing that Zumza and Luka are clearly defending each other?

A doctor or bodyguard. Luka? Those are veeeeery specific guessed

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 22:31:48

!unvote

!vote Luka504

At this point I'm equally suspicious of him, because of his weird buddying with Zumza.

Dont worry zumza, I haven't given up on you, friend.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 22:34:52

Unless I'm really missing something, Luka only has 8 votes atm. So this isn't me trying to hammer it home.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-15 23:52:19

Nooo failgirl pls we were so close to ending this **** day

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 02:50:23

!unvote

!vote Zumza

Thank God you guys are finally listening about him.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 02:52:44

To be clear- I changed my vote off of Zumza yesterday only because I was suspicious of Luka as well, not because I stopped suspecting Zumza

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 17:02:34

Look.

Me, Anak, bobithan, and maxi have explained why we think Zumza is scum SO. MANY. TIMES.

I'm not going to make another post. My vote stays. Do what you want.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 17:06:41

Also processor- you haven't even been contributing lately. I'm sorry but we have gone through the Zumza case, like I said, SO MANY TIMES.

It's a little suspicious that you conveniently come back when he's about to be lynched and start defending him and "not seeing" our arguments.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:25:33

Processor you literally can just go back 10 pages. But fine.

Here:

It started when Zumza was asked a simple question about his phrasing. Instead of answer directly, like a NOT obnoxious person would do, he said this literal horse ****

Zumza wrote:

Keep in mind that the reciprocal of that quote is also true. (How does make you feel?)
And no I'm not going to answer the question that you can answer yourself. (Can't I post smiley faces? Its the first time I do this so tell me...)
The most innocent people are the ones who die first.

And kept spitting out garbage like this

Zumza wrote:

Reversing reverse psychology, reverses this game logic.

(literally what?)

This caused me and Anak to begin to get suspicious. Anak soon said this-

Anak wrote:

So not only did you dodge my question, but you refused to answer it? Why? It doesn't matter if we can "answer it ourselves". If you're blatantly avoiding questions asked to you, it makes you look pretty suspicious.
(Also, did you edit that post somehow? I'm pretty sure the sheep image and thereafter wasn't there when I first saw it)

And I said this

me wrote:

Zumza- telling him to answer his own questions is what's making you look so damn suspicious. Just give a straightforward answer and ditch this whole cutesy ambiguous persona

Anak wrote:

I don't recall you responding to this post (Anak is referring to the one two above this)

So we started calling him out on it. To no avail. All he gave us was more annoying responses and a link to the lyrics to "the lion sleeps tonight".. ?

And saying stuff like this

Zumza wrote:

So if you don't recall it I guess you were able to answer yourself after all?
Thats exactly what I want to say by try answer yourself.

So we continued to call him out on it. I even tried to tie it back to the original confusion because some people (like you, Processor) refused to just go back a couple pages and read.

Pyromaniac wrote:

This was the first one that made me suspicious. You can't say that he went to sleep because he literally responded shortly after, just with a completely unrelated post. Admittedly, he finally did answer this, but not until MUCH later and with a weird sheep image and a video of "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" lryics.
There have been more instances of his dodging (just go back a page or two). But this was the first.

Anak, being the good guy that he is posted this, catching all you LAZY **** **** up.

Anak wrote:

If your answer, Zumza, to this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 67#p588667
Was this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 98#p588698
Then I do apologise. I didn't originally make a connection as you didn't quote my post or link to it or anything.
The cryptic manner in which you respond to other posts however is still suspicious. If that was your response, you could have just said so, instead of saying this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 10#p588710
I may have made an error in reading, but that still doesn't excuse your behaviour both before and after that. It wouldn't have harmed you to just be forthright instead of trying to... do whatever you were trying to do. It wasn't helpful nor didn't get you anywhere.
Curiously, though, you did not include these posts in your little summary at all.
I asked this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 56#p588456 2 days ago. You posted this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 64#p588464 Completely unrelated, showing you must have seen my post, else you're not even reading the thread properly. You made a lot of posts after that. About 3 hours later, I prodded you to respond: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 13#p588513 To which you disregarded what I had to say for an irrelevant comment: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 16#p588516 It was implied I didn't incldue the rest of your post because I was focusing on that one line, which seemed separated from the rest. No need for your comment to be made and to ignore my post.
You then responded a day after with this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 04#p588604 I noticed the initial response was 10 minutes after I prodded you, so this must be the post which you referred to as your response (that I didn't see apparently?) That post was not even a straight answer! More cryptics! You also posted this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 08#p588608 I responded to you with this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 66#p588666 Granted I didn't ask you anything there, so I suppose there was no need to respond again. Straight after, however, I posted this: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 67#p588667 I'm not sure if this was your answer, but you posted this here: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 98#p588698
I came back at you: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 01#p588701 You: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 05#p588705 Me: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 06#p588706 And then you made yet again another cryptic answer: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 10#p588710
And now we're up to speed! So, I have no idea why you feel the need to answer with cryptic messages, and not only to me. You said that you dodged my questions bc I could answer them myself? Celarly not if I'm asking you.

Zumba continued to defend himself, but refused to just answer us directly.. (Ugh, I know right?) He kept saying things like...

Zumza wrote:

I did answer Anak question.
Anak still says that I didn't response... I ask her / him to give me a list of questions but she / he refused that.
Anak is very stubborn without any reasons and that blinds her / his activity.
I just consider that being open minded its crucial to win this game. A quality Anak didn't prove yet.

To which I said...

Pyro wrote:

Its not Anak's responsibility to help clear you. You should be reading back to see what you missed. You're being very difficult. Ive said the same thing to you like 200 times so I'm done arguing

---

I lost track of where this would fall in the epic saga of our battle, but Anak did also say this which may help you.

Anak wrote:

That's not what I'm talking about. I responded to your post with one question that you didn't answer. Apparently me being stubborn blinds me, when you seem blind to everything that I ask to you. (I wouldn't think I've been stubborn anyhow)
http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 06#p588706
http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 07#p588707
On those posts, you didn't give a straight answer at all, just "answer yourself". Don't try and pass that off as an answer lmao. You should notice how you are slowing creeping onto everyone's suspicion lists, and crawling towards top place. I wonder what behaviour you've been exhibiting for that to happen? (Rhetorical question, that's the only one you don't have to answer)

Sorry if I messed up the quotes but this took too long for something that could've been avoided if you just went back and read

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:35:16

In summation-I am entirely unsure of how you can get a town reading from Zumza. He has dodged all of the questions asked of him, has been ENTIRELY unhelpful (to the point that it seems like he's trying to be), and has not contributed anything to the topic except some vague and purposeless song lyrics and a picture of a wolf dressed like a sheep. He has continually told people to "answer their own questions", (and if that ain't scummy, I dont know what is).

If he is town, he deserves to be lynched anyway for causing this much damn confusion.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:38:59

Processor wrote:

I don't know what a scum has to gain by being this way.

He is new to the game, and judging by past dealings with him on the forum I'm assuming he's fairly young.

Put these two things together and you get someone that may think that not answering questions directly is a way to avoid the hotseat.

Or he could've **** up the first time he refused to answer a question, realized how scummy it made him look, and has just been trying to defend that post and keep a consistent play style/avoid backpedalling since then.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:42:17

Processor wrote:

I don't know what a scum has to gain by being this way.

Also- What does a TOWN player have to gain by being this way??

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:46:52

Ok at risk of sounding too anxious to just get this done-

If we're going to lynch someone today anyway, Zumza is obviously the better lynch. Luka may arguably be more scummy (even though I dont see it, maybe equally), but at least his posts make sense.

If we spare Zumza and lynch Luka, and Luka ends up being town, then we killed a town and STILL have to deal with Zumza's vague **** posts. On the other hand, if we take out Zumza and HE turns out to be town, at least we will be able to understand Luka's defense.....

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:53:48

Processor wrote:

Nothing but so what? Still doesn't prove the opposite.

But why would a law abiding townie go out of their way to be difficult and cause confusion?

Fine. If the majority decides to lynch Luka, I can live with that.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 18:54:40

And to be fair to maxi, it is kind of weird that after nearly two or so IRL days of inactivity (you just popping in every so often to say "Hi"), that you come back defending Zumza...

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 20:32:47

You know what? Fine. But if this results in an nolynch it's on you Processor. We wouldn't even be losing anything of value by lynching Zumza anyway. Just gotta make everything more difficult and confusing.

!lynch Luka504

God this is gonna be a mess

Processor, Creature

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-17 20:33:20

ZeldaXD wrote:

"GUYS GUYS X IS AGREEING WITH Y THEY MUST BE SCUM!"

Wow great contribution to the thread lol thanks

Processor, TaskManager

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-19 23:31:34

Anak why

This makes me look really bad, and I can't defend myself for seemingly buddying up with Anak yet except by saying that he really hit the gold mine with Zumza.

I mean c'mon, Zumza, can your posts be any more obnoxious?

I'd say that this (unfortunately, I really, REALLY wanted to lynch Zumza) takes our friend out of the hotseat, and is probably going to put me in it.

I'd deflect onto Bobithan but he may just be in the same situation as I am. Which is having been fooled by Zumza's loose grasp on English grammar.

See, even in defeat I maintain a certain level of pretension. Thats how its done.

Zumza

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-21 02:39:12

Hey guys.. I really, really think that someone (detective) should check out creature and/or W24 tonight.

I really think so.

I can't really tell you why I dont think but something kinda fishy happened lol

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-21 02:46:56

I mean I think its against the rules to post screenshots from stuff outside this thread.

Creature either **** up really badly or is trying to troll (but I feel like this level of trolling would absolutely be against the rules)

This is a gray area.. Like pre-Oz Kansas style.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#26 2016-03-15 01:17:21

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#27 2016-03-15 15:24:27

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#28 2016-03-15 16:39:27

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#29 2016-03-15 19:57:47

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#30 2016-03-15 19:59:31

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#31 2016-03-15 21:55:57

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#32 2016-03-15 22:31:48

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#33 2016-03-15 22:34:52

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#34 2016-03-15 23:52:19

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#35 2016-03-17 02:50:23

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#36 2016-03-17 02:52:44

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#37 2016-03-17 17:02:34

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#38 2016-03-17 17:06:41

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#39 2016-03-17 18:25:33

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#40 2016-03-17 18:35:16

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#41 2016-03-17 18:38:59

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#42 2016-03-17 18:42:17

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#43 2016-03-17 18:46:52

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#44 2016-03-17 18:53:48

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#45 2016-03-17 18:54:40

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#46 2016-03-17 20:32:47

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#47 2016-03-17 20:33:20

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#48 2016-03-19 23:31:34

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#49 2016-03-21 02:39:12

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

#50 2016-03-21 02:46:56

Re: Mafia 6 game thread:Multiball (Town wins!)

Board footer