Idea: Smiley Collision

Tamashiimizu · 2015-12-11 16:06:22

Smiley collision? Awesome! Let's add some relativistic mechanics too!

Tako · 2015-12-11 19:12:35

Insanity wrote:

Processor wrote:
Do we treat smileys as squares or circles regarding collision? Also, yay double / triple jumps! That would be fun for many coops.
circles would probably be a better option

It would be realistic but if you think we have lag now, just wait until you have to calculate collision based on circles. Trig functions butcher performance. Then again, I have no idea what I'm talking about.

shadowda wrote:

what if someone just stands there?
i sort of assumed you could push people.
maybe it should take two or three players to push another.

I mean, just follow how normal pushing is done. If they aren't offering any resistance (i.e., they're just sitting there and not hitting any keys) then you should be able to push them around. If they are moving in the opposite direction and towards each other, then it should be zero-sum movement.

--
I'm just a little unconvinced this would be actually useful and not just a gimmick that we enjoy for a month, like cake and holograms.

Koya

TaskManager · 2015-12-11 19:43:22

It should be as an effect to avoid smileys blocking passages and such.
I woot it because I want it.
BUT, do you realise how much work it would take? It's even harder to implement than moveable blocks..
>you have to code collisions of 2 objects that can move
>now on top of that you have to make those objects be controlled from different devices which can cause lag
>not only lag will cause annoying problems, it will cause hundreds of exploits with this whole thing.

Anch · 2015-12-11 21:39:19

maxi123 wrote:

BUT, do you realise how much work it would take? It's even harder to implement than moveable blocks..

I don't think it is...

AmdS · 2015-12-12 02:15:36

oxidizerx wrote:

Maybe like an effect, so 1 room you would have to climb to get a key so everybody can move forward.

I think if world option would be better than a effect

2015-12-12 12:01:10

Bobithan had already suggested this once. But yeah, aside from the huge lag I think it would cause it would be amazing.

TaskManager · 2015-12-12 16:14:34

anch159 wrote:

maxi123 wrote:
BUT, do you realise how much work it would take? It's even harder to implement than moveable blocks..
I don't think it is...

Yes it is.
Moveable block = moveable solid object
Smiley collision = moveable solid object that lags cus latency

cpcrabs · 2015-12-14 11:40:37

this would be so good. imagine pvp worlds.

mind.

blown.

Insanity · 2015-12-18 21:57:32

bump

Insanity · 2015-12-18 21:58:26

bump

zioxei · 2015-12-18 22:35:41

hump

Prodigy · 2015-12-18 22:41:37

trump hehe good

TaskManager · 2015-12-18 23:43:36

lump
of
coal

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#26 2015-12-11 16:06:22

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#27 2015-12-11 19:12:35

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#28 2015-12-11 19:43:22

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#29 2015-12-11 21:39:19

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#30 2015-12-12 02:15:36

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#31 2015-12-12 12:01:10

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#32 2015-12-12 16:14:34

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#33 2015-12-14 11:40:37

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#34 2015-12-18 21:57:32

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#35 2015-12-18 21:58:26

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#36 2015-12-18 22:35:41

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#37 2015-12-18 22:41:37

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

#38 2015-12-18 23:43:36

Re: Idea: Smiley Collision

Board footer