Official Everybody Edits Forums

0176

Member

From: Brazil

Joined: 2021-09-05

Posts: 3,174

Re: Woot stats

May the popularity contest begin!

Anch

Member

Joined: 2015-02-16

Posts: 5,447

Re: Woot stats

I think the wooting system should be removed from some forumers cause they are clearly abusing it

Creature

Member

From: The Dark Web

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,658

Re: Woot stats

Anch159, you want Woot stats just because you're on top of it.

Woot =/= Popularity.

---

This is a false statement.

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

Approximate wooted posts per top 10 users.

  21788 anch159
  15382 N1KF
  13975 Onjit
   9249 Xfrogman43
   8365 some man
   7916 skullz17
   7052 gkaby
   5617 Pingohits
   5399 Different55
   5304 Bobithan

Any new updates on this? An automatic list would be nice, though it is also fine just imagining how quickly I will beat anch159.

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

Approximate wooted posts per top 10 users.

  21788 anch159
  15382 N1KF
  13975 Onjit
   9249 Xfrogman43
   8365 some man
   7916 skullz17
   7052 gkaby
   5617 Pingohits
   5399 Different55
   5304 Bobithan

Any new updates on this? An automatic list would be nice, though it is also fine just imagining how quickly I will beat anch159.

Those aren't actual statistics that was supposed to be a joke >_>

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Hexagon

Member

Joined: 2015-04-22

Posts: 1,213

Re: Woot stats

Those aren't actual statistics that was supposed to be a joke >_>

These are actual statistics. I downloaded most of the website with wget, and did a grep search to extract usernames.

Having said that, the numbers do looks very very very high, and I'll double check to make sure. A recalc will take about 5+ hours, so it'll be a while.

---

???

Creature

Member

From: The Dark Web

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,658

Re: Woot stats

I doubt Xfrogman43 wooted even 1k times.

---

This is a false statement.

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

I doubt Xfrogman43 wooted even 1k times.

That would only take forty pages. Just look around the forum and see how many topics have been Xfrogman43'd.

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

Those aren't actual statistics that was supposed to be a joke >_>

These are actual statistics. I downloaded most of the website with wget, and did a grep search to extract usernames.

Having said that, the numbers do looks very very very high, and I'll double check to make sure. A recalc will take about 5+ hours, so it'll be a while.

I could  put together a script on my end to loop through all posts and tally everything up. Unfortunately woots are serialized arrays instead of a full table so I can't just do a quick SQL statement to put together a list but it'll still be a lot quicker than grepping pages.

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Xfrogman43

Member

From: need to find a new home

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,174

Re: Woot stats

I doubt Xfrogman43 wooted even 1k times.

Bruh fite me itl m8 il sho u wat 1k woots fels lik

But no seriously I've been wooting a lot lately secretly. (;

---

thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar

Hexagon

Member

Joined: 2015-04-22

Posts: 1,213

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF
  26533 Xfrogman43
  25354 anch159
  14969 Onjit
   8767 some
   8748 man
   8402 skullz17
   7240 gkaby
   5780 Pingohits
   5606 Different55
   5483 Bobithan

Since I didn't get the *entire* website, it could be more. I'd really like someone else to calculate them, because right now I don't have confidence in those results.

---

???

rgl32

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 543

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF
  26533 Xfrogman43
  25354 anch159
  14969 Onjit
   8767 some
   8748 man
   8402 skullz17
   7240 gkaby
   5780 Pingohits
   5606 Different55
   5483 Bobithan

Since I didn't get the *entire* website, it could be more. I'd really like someone else to calculate them, because right now I don't have confidence in those results.

Well from a quick glance, Some man should be one person and not 2, so based on that I think they are off anyway, and people are severely wasting their time if they are really going back to woot old posts that have no purpose anymore, which is what people are doing if your data is somewhat accurate.

Xfrogman43

Member

From: need to find a new home

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,174

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF
  26533 Xfrogman43
  25354 anch159
  14969 Onjit
   8767 some
   8748 man
   8402 skullz17
   7240 gkaby
   5780 Pingohits
   5606 Different55
   5483 Bobithan

Since I didn't get the *entire* website, it could be more. I'd really like someone else to calculate them, because right now I don't have confidence in those results.

Well from a quick glance, Some man should be one person and not 2, so based on that I think they are off anyway, and people are severely wasting their time if they are really going back to woot old posts that have no purpose anymore, which is what people are doing if your data is somewhat accurate.

Lol it counts spaces in names as other users.

---

thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF
  26533 Xfrogman43
  25354 anch159
  14969 Onjit
   8767 some
   8748 man
   8402 skullz17
   7240 gkaby
   5780 Pingohits
   5606 Different55
   5483 Bobithan

Since I didn't get the *entire* website, it could be more. I'd really like someone else to calculate them, because right now I don't have confidence in those results.

I got your back, Jack

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Onjit

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,710

Website

Re: Woot stats

I seriously doubt I have wooted 15000 posts.

No really.

---

:.|:;

rgl32

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 543

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF
  26533 Xfrogman43
  25354 anch159
  14969 Onjit
   8767 some
   8748 man
   8402 skullz17
   7240 gkaby
   5780 Pingohits
   5606 Different55
   5483 Bobithan

Since I didn't get the *entire* website, it could be more. I'd really like someone else to calculate them, because right now I don't have confidence in those results.

Well from a quick glance, Some man should be one person and not 2, so based on that I think they are off anyway, and people are severely wasting their time if they are really going back to woot old posts that have no purpose anymore, which is what people are doing if your data is somewhat accurate.

Lol it counts spaces in names as other users.

I know that, but then his woot count doesnt make sense, does it? how can it split the woots between the 2 then if they count as different people?

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF

I...I HAVE WOOTED OVER ONE-SIXTH OF ALL POSTS? WHAT HAVE I DONE

Hexagon

Member

Joined: 2015-04-22

Posts: 1,213

Re: Woot stats

I...I HAVE WOOTED OVER ONE-SIXTH OF ALL POSTS? WHAT HAVE I DONE

Well you pretty much wooted every post in this thread, and every post in my thread about ee recommendation and ee crawler...

---

???

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF

I...I HAVE WOOTED OVER ONE-SIXTH OF ALL POSTS? WHAT HAVE I DONE

You haven't. trustme

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

New stats
  86942 N1KF

I...I HAVE WOOTED OVER ONE-SIXTH OF ALL POSTS? WHAT HAVE I DONE

You haven't. trustme

Well, I did go over several long forum games and woot all the posts...

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

1. N1KF 16820
2. Xfrogman43 8341
3. anch159 1481
4. Onjit 759
5. skullz17 489
6. some man 476
7. gkaby 353
8. Pingohits 308
9. Different55 300
10. Bobithan 275
Displaying 10/231 wooters.
Completed in 0.29453587532043

We ended up with a lot of the same names, but way different numbers.

I compared the two and it looks like your numbers are usually ~18x higher than mine, except for the spamwooters who were only off by 4 or 5. I really hope it's because of a programming problem and not because they wooted enough since you posted your numbers to close the gap between 18x and 5x.

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Bobithan

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,476

Re: Woot stats

N1KF how did you find the time to woot 16,820 posts

---

aka towwl

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

3.5% of all posts have been wooted by me. Not bad, I guess I should see if I can get 99% (not 100% due to almost 1% of posts being mine).

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Woot stats

Or you could do something productive with your life, that's always an option.

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,158

Website

Re: Woot stats

Okay, finished with Update Discussion. I might consider going through the whole Game Business and Forum Business fora first since they do not have many topics and generally do not get many new posts.

Edit: Finished all topics in Game Business with 75 or less posts. Also, Xfrogman43 seems to have been doing the same thing...