Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
What makes your theory more right than an invisible pink unicorn, or a matrix programmer, or the big bang? What are you arguing here? Where is your justification?
Although I wouldn't necessarily use your words, a "matrix programmer" is a perfectly valid explanation. Take Nick Bostrom's simulation hypothesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Bostr … hypothesis
Read that. It is a good explanation, if not thorough enough.
Offline
[ Started around 1738795677.0923 - Generated in 0.028 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.36 MiB (Peak: 1.43 MiB) ]