Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Not like it reallllly matters, but after you beat the level, you can get stuck in the "U" in stuck lmao
Not like it reallly matters, but at the end of The Memory Game, one of the mini's that previously used a glitch to beat is now impossible so you can't get all coins.
Fanboys being attained through daily login is actually a really good idea. It gives incentive to log in everyday
I agree with Zoey, doing artwork for the fanboy II was really fun, so it'd be cool to do more interactive things with the community
So a lot of people complain about their worlds becoming a campaign tier without their permission, or people giving consent awhile ago and then changing their mind. I think a simple solution is to make a forum channel where you can put a list of worlds you're fine with becoming a campaign tier. That way the campaign curators can pluck worlds from that list without trying to hunt the world owner down. If a world isn't on that list, then they should be forced to ask for permission from the world owner, despite whatever consent they gave in the past.
ASDruska wrote:you've made FF practice and PF practice finish the trilogy with BS practice
PF practice world already exists and made by Kira.
Uh, I'm the one who made the practice worlds.
you've made FF practice and PF practice finish the trilogy with BS practice
I've already finished the trilogy with Tutorial practice.
Should I make a Bittersweet practice world, and would you actually play it?
http://www.strawpoll.me/14780463
But what about bots? Like what do we consider as "spam"? Most worlds that i join have bots in them that repeat the same thing over and over again and i really don't think that should be qualified as spam. Also what if you have proof of somebody hacking in a campaign (Example: them being in a place that is impossible to get to without hacks, them admitting to using hacks, etc.). Is that still not report worthy even with picture proof?
Akatsuk1 wrote:There's like over 20 campaigns, and only 3 of them are extreme... I don't know what reason there is to complain, the pros need some campaigns to play too.
The "pros" have their own community within the community and build exclusive maps for each other, trying to make themself rq
The bigger part of the community do not belong to this club of no-lifer and play if they feel like it - yet meet the man with the hammer and quit upon seeing the first mini of any of these ridicilous campaigns.
There is a reason why people cheat / hack after all. Furthermore, the recent "attacks on campaign levels" to prevent people from joining might indiciate frustration over the developement of the game in terms of campaigns - or in general.The current staff should primarily focus on something else than hardcore-content for once.
Okay, and the "noobs" have their own community within the community that build easy maps... So what's your point?
I get that the bigger part of the community aren't pros, but that's why theres 20+ campaigns for them to play, which is more than enough in my opinion. Also being good at this game means you have "no-life"? Bruh I'm engaged, studying to become a veterinarian and i have plenty of friends and family... With 24 hour saves, you could literally play a single mini a day for like an hour if you truly wanted to beat one of the extreme campaigns, just takes practice. Also if people quit the game after seeing a hard level, than its on them. You don't study to become a doctor and immediately start with brain surgery, do you? You need to ease yourself in, and not start with the hardest difficulty. And people cheated in the advent calendar campaign too, so it's not the difficulty that's the problem, people are just too lazy to play and just want rewards. And I'm pretty sure the "attack on campaign levels" is just anger because of the current staff. Also, this campaign has been in the works for months now, the staff weren't focusing on it. It was basically done for awhile now, they just decided to release it to show "hey guys, we know theres a lot of **** going on right now, but you're still gonna get updates."
TLDR; lol we got an easy campaign literally a month ago and the last extreme campaign was last year... So like, chill or whatever. The staff is still hard at work on other things.
There's like over 20 campaigns, and only 3 of them are extreme... I don't know what reason there is to complain, the pros need some campaigns to play too.
If ya need a new mod i'd be happy enough to apply :] (I know you're not recruiting)
You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain...
Yeah I guess, I personally think Jesse will be a good owner, though i doubt he'd want to be.
Akatsuk1 wrote:TBH it doesn't matter who becomes owner or not, NVD didn't do **** so whoever we get who at least comes on once a month is going to be better.
Why would you need "at least better" when you can have the best
Nou is at least better, but it doesn't mean he should be here
That's true, but i highly doubt we are going to be getting the best... What I'm saying is, whoever we get will be better.
TBH it doesn't matter who becomes owner or not, NVD didn't do **** so whoever we get who at least comes on once a month is going to be better.
Wow EEjesse isn't on the list
But then it's so completely obvious that it's considered useless. It's like saying that if my freaking grandpa had 2 wheels he'd be a bicycle.
What's wrong about complaining? Complaining is bad? I can't criticize something? Can't I say what to improve? Oh and that of "that's how life works" just makes it worse, you are saying that things being bad is irrelevant. It's not.
This is my last response. It's not "completely obvious" because you tried to argue against it saying that you "are forced to do it". So you just contradicted yourself. Also, complaining isn't bad if it is constructive. You were not saying how to improve it, you were merely saying "it's bad because i don't like it". Also i never said that things being bad is irrelevant. If something is truly terrible, work on trying to resolve it instead of pointless complaining, which in this scenario, is indeed pointless. The campaign levels are already chosen, if you want a better campaign next year, then post some ideas on the campaign forums and actually try to make a difference.
Akatsuk1 wrote:P788 wrote:Akatsuk1 wrote:P788 wrote:What if I want to get the badge? Then the answer is yes, I am forced to do it.
I don't know if you understand what the word "forced" means... You are not forced to do this level, you are choosing to do it because you want the badge, huge difference. And also the levels take like a couple minutes at most to beat.
If you are being attacked and you punch them very hard to make them stop and they go away, then I was being forced to react in self-defense, not just wanting them to stop and go away.
So what you're saying is you're forced to do this campaign in self-defense? Because the scenario you just described has absolutely nothing to do about a video game about jumping smileys.
Between "something just being done because you want it" and "being forced to" there's a gradient.
I gave a extreme example to say that there's a point on the line where it really means that you're forced to, because you said that "wanting a badge" never ever implies that you're forced.
Edit because you edited the original post... :
Also, if we are being technical, the definition of "force" is to do something against your own will. You weren't "forced" to punch somebody in self-defense, it was an option that you chose to do. It may have been the only opportune option, but it is an option nonetheless of your own free will.
Then congratulations, HG said something completely irrelevant, since "forced to" is a impossible thing.
HG wrote:You're not forced to play the campaign if you don't like it
Which you didn't reply to in the 9 days that post existed.
I don't understand your point at all. HG is correct, you are not forced to play the campaign. It's not irrelevant, it's the truth. But i'll humor you, let's say that you ARE being forced to play the campaign because you so desperately want the badge, and the levels are driving you insane because they are so terribly bad. In the end, your complaint is irrelevant because if you are truly being forced to play the campaign like you say you are, then there is no amount of complaining that will prevent you from having to complete it. It'd be like complaining that you can't shoot lasers out of your eyes, no matter how much you whine, it won't make a difference. Anyways, to end my point; if you don't like it, but you want the badge, then it's unfortunate because that's how life works. You might get unlucky in the future and be forced to work a job that you hate just to provide for your family. Life isn't fair.
EDIT: I'm done responding btw :]
Akatsuk1 wrote:P788 wrote:What if I want to get the badge? Then the answer is yes, I am forced to do it.
I don't know if you understand what the word "forced" means... You are not forced to do this level, you are choosing to do it because you want the badge, huge difference. And also the levels take like a couple minutes at most to beat.
If you are being attacked and you punch them very hard to make them stop and they go away, then I was being forced to react in self-defense, not just wanting them to stop and go away.
So what you're saying is you're forced to do this campaign in self-defense? Because the scenario you just described has absolutely nothing to do about a video game about jumping smileys. Also, if we are being technical, the definition of "force" is to do something against your own will. You weren't "forced" to punch somebody in self-defense, it was an option that you chose to do. It may have been the only opportune option, but it is an option nonetheless of your own free will.
What if I want to get the badge? Then the answer is yes, I am forced to do it.
I don't know if you understand what the word "forced" means... You are not forced to do this level, you are choosing to do it because you want the badge, huge difference. And also the levels take like a couple minutes at most to beat.
Akatsuk1 wrote:LOL Alesmile didn't hack, the 51/50 coins is because another checkpoint and coin was added while he was doing it. He literally spent the last couple of days doing the level.
I knew that was the case.
Akatsuk1 wrote:Also i find it funny that somebody who hacked PF is accusing somebody else of hacking :] But that's none of my business.
I just thought throw out a hackusation, as you and several people have done to me in the past.
It's funny when people accuse others of hacking from the basis of nothing.
Well I don't really wanna have this conversation here, because i stopped caring about hackers a long time ago. But i'm just saying that somebody who is well versed in making bots and stuff who isn't skilled enough to beat PF beating it faster than Orangecrix did is kinda fishy..
Alesmile wrote:I think I went too far this time
https://i.imgur.com/4B4lKw3.pngnice hacks
LOL Alesmile didn't hack, the 51/50 coins is because another checkpoint and coin was added while he was doing it. He literally spent the last couple of days doing the level. Also i find it funny that somebody who hacked PF is accusing somebody else of hacking :] But that's none of my business.
Akatsuk1 wrote:Also what happens when you beat that campaign? Then you still have no way to reset progress
why would you want to play that **** level anyway
Tell that to Alesmile
Also what happens when you beat that campaign? Then you still have no way to reset progress
[ Started around 1732361932.2256 - Generated in 0.174 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.62 MiB (Peak: 1.84 MiB) ]