Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

Advertisement

Hello, visitor! These forums are run off of the revenue generated from these ads. If you'd like to support us, please whitelist us or consider donating:

#1 Re: Game Discussion » Official 'Look what I got!' topic » 2019-04-19 14:49:47

mutantdevle wrote:
peace wrote:

WTF zoey thats ~4 years   did you btw got somethign on day 1K? or just normal reward?

If I remember correctly, I think she got a diamond for 1k.

No that was another **** lie
We were all fooled

#2 Re: Forum Discussion » Official Intro/Outro Thread » 2019-04-19 13:58:34

Anatoly wrote:
TaskManager wrote:

ooooof
what the hell is happening with all the good ppl leaving

yes because people bully here.

It's not the bullied people that are leaving, sadly

#3 Re: Game Suggestions » Rename God Mode to Fly Mode » 2019-04-19 13:57:00

Gosha wrote:

What's all the fuzz if about let's just create 2 types of fly mode first one is noclip where which acts like regular god mode as we know it but we introduce new block called noclipblock(er) which will collide with the player in noclip mode and second one is actual god mode and you won't collide with that noclipblock(er) my solution solves these problems of naming things by making them into separate suggestions it was so easy duh

noclip blockers should be patreon only and godmode should be divine supporter only then

#5 Re: Off Topic Discussion » FREE GOOD GAME[s] -- TRANSISTOR // ASSASSIN'S CREED: UNITY » 2019-04-19 00:50:16

ac: unity is free on uplay btw because of notre dame de paris on fire

edit: @zoey bruh **** epic games, its a bunch of spyware lol

#6 Re: Forum Discussion » Official Intro/Outro Thread » 2019-04-19 00:49:21

ooooof
what the hell is happening with all the good ppl leaving

#7 Re: Off Topic Discussion » What is your wallpaper? » 2019-04-17 20:33:05

it's been almost 2 years and i'm still with this one

big

#8 Re: Game Suggestions » Rename God Mode to Fly Mode » 2019-04-17 20:31:26

Latif wrote:

You're exaggerating lol. A change such as this one only takes a few seconds. Also, very nice job on changing the definition of that phrase.

but why make such change if everybody BUT you is fine with it as it is right now??
also im sorry that i did not get my message across with that phrase in my first post and had to explain it

Latif wrote:

You can also just try to stay positive instead of hating instantly, even if you disagree.

well, that's what you did in your reply though

#11 Re: Game Suggestions » Rename God Mode to Fly Mode » 2019-04-17 19:23:52

Latif wrote:

So that means you don't mind if they changed it? Sure, thanks for the useful information.

I do mind because I'm used to the current name
there's no need to put words in my mouth just to vent your frustration on me
"people dont give a ****" means that people are fine with it as it is right now and you seem to be the only one engrossed with naming things properly enough to suggest something so insignificant when there are clearly more important tasks to be done

#12 Re: Game Suggestions » Rename God Mode to Fly Mode » 2019-04-17 16:30:45

does it really bother you that much? i can sense ak712's presence in this thread
i dont give a **** about it and neither do most people
everyone's used to it

Anatoly wrote:

Fly mode is god mode without edit,
god mode is god mode with edit

so the definition of "god mode" is recursive and the fly mode is god mode with edit without edit?

#14 Re: Forum Discussion » Official Intro/Outro Thread » 2019-04-15 15:18:59

damn
forums will be less fun without you
goodbye, will be missed

#15 Re: Game Business » Welcome back, Koya! » 2019-04-14 21:34:19

didnt koya use to be a he
:thinking:
how did that transition go?

#16 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Would anyone be interested in a game of Mafia? » 2019-04-13 22:04:29

The Soybean role is lame.
This particular rule sucks:

You may not disclose these to the other members of your team.

Forcing one player to withhold information from the rest of their team is lame and really harmful towards the team spirit
It is also hard to draw the line in this rule to determine what breaks it and what doesn't because it's a rule regulating the content of communication. Similarly to the rule that forbade players to figure out each other's roles via asking what did the last line in each of their rolecards say.
Finally, if the player with this role ends up sharing the information with the other two, maybe even indirectly (dropping hints instead of saying it literally), what are you going to do about it?

Onjit wrote:

An earlier version of the loaf faction's win condition had is so they would win if ALL of their members were alive at the end or they had a majority, but they didn't know each other.

Perhaps the earlier win condition would require the team to play more strategically to use their 3 votes and private messages (?) to survive? If they all know their teammates, I think it'd be a bit more fair, but also more unique than just "not town but actually..." since they'd be more incentivised to play separately from the town.

Example of different Loaf Faction:

Your faction wins if all Loaf member are alive at the end of the game (regardless of what team wins) or the Loaf Faction has a majority of the total players
Your teammates are A and B. You may talk with them here: <link>

White Bread - Each night, choose a player and attempt to see their role card
Sourdough - Each night, choose a member of your faction and prevent any visitors' actions from working (including nightkills)
Garlic Bread - Each night, choose a player and send them a private message (via me)

I think an "all must survive" win condition would've been better, yes
I also had the following ideas:
a) Each bread can heal (prevent nightkill) each of their teammates (but not themselves), only once throughout the game, this results in each Bread having 2 heals and each Bread can be healed twice
b) With the "All must survive to win" condition, once one of the Breads die, the other two could have their role changed, or have something else done to them, such as:
- Each of the surviving breads turns into a neutral role and has a weak harmful night action (roleblocking, for example, or it could be randomized to spice things up. no killing abilities though) and they can still win the game if they somehow gain majority
- Each of the surviving breads suicides the next night (because they lost already) and each takes one of the alive players with them to avenge their fallen brother. Possibility of such a quad kill/double suicide would motivate Town not to hang Breads mindlessly and go for Snags instead

#17 Re: Off Topic Discussion » What's your IQ » 2019-04-13 20:55:23

Raphe9000 wrote:
Yu wrote:

Online tests are fake. You need to take an on-site, in-person test preferably referred by Mensa.

I took an in-person test though. Stop denying my genius! I know an 86 is high, but it's not unbelievable!

Don't let them fool you. You have to see through the lies of the jedi normies. You're a true genius. I admire your wisdom and it is a great honour for myself to be in a single thread with a pioneer of mind like you.

#19 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Would anyone be interested in a game of Mafia? » 2019-04-13 17:02:26

Onjit is now onjit wrote:

You are a member of the Loaf Faction, and you’d like to keep it that way

>You'd like to keep it this way
What does this imply? I might have missed something, is there a role that converts others?
I'm also not sure what's the point of the entire bread faction, they're essentially an independent group of townies that are aware of eachother
The win conditions are writen in a way that allows Breads to team with the  Town and it will most likely happen because for both sides there's only gain from it
Breads' alignment is basically "not town but actually town"
It makes the game more town sided

#20 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Would anyone be interested in a game of Mafia? » 2019-04-13 13:30:13

Anatoly wrote:
Luka504 wrote:
Anatoly wrote:
TaskManager wrote:

Oh yeah.
Please do remember that anatoly was modkilled in mafia 13 and luka was partially throwing that game too (but he doesn't seem to be willing to play anyway).

You will never change.

I don't understand why you're mad here - Maxi has only stated the truth. You have a bad history with mafia games, and therefore you're more likely to cause problems in future games, especially considering you haven't grown or matured much since mafia 13.

Future is not past.

You can toss around random phrases that you just came up with as much as you want
That doesn't show that you have grown up in the slightest though

#21 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Would anyone be interested in a game of Mafia? » 2019-04-12 22:07:36

Oh yeah.
Please do remember that anatoly was modkilled in mafia 13 and luka was partially throwing that game too (but he doesn't seem to be willing to play anyway).

#22 Re: Forum Discussion » Hide posts from specific people. » 2019-04-12 19:31:12

Anatoly wrote:

It’s hard to ignore every post on this forums...

Then don't visit the forums at all

Anatoly wrote:

Also, lock this topic, before Luka and his gang will come.

This is not your topic. Not anymore at least. You have to realize that locking topics left and right won't always be the magic key to avoiding criticism

#23 Re: Forum Discussion » Hide posts from specific people. » 2019-04-12 18:21:20

Instalocking a topic because you predict that people will derail it
This is a whole new level
I think "muting" people on forums is a bad idea because context missing
What doesn't let you ignore their posts anyway?

#24 Re: Game Discussion » Everybody Edits Ultra Realistic Textures » 2019-04-08 23:50:21

your face when you think that your game is finally safe but nah it gets hacked once again
M6mIIRB.png

#25 Re: Game Discussion » Staff hacked?! Snippet showing 5 minutes of suspicious behavior » 2019-04-08 22:50:14

every world in the lobby is empty, including campaign worlds
oh god oh ****

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1555820666.2566 - Generated in 0.283 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.75 MiB (Peak: 3.12 MiB) ]