Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Game Discussion » Unity lobby design » 2016-05-25 18:37:33

Ben

You're moving the game to a completely different platform, you cannot stick to the old design.

Look, the game is evolving and the UI can evolve with it. We need a clean, minimal design.


This is what I had in mind:

iYOUsSb.png


You can view more here.

#3 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Is this an automated message or 2 crazy women!? » 2016-04-25 18:12:06

Ben
AmdS wrote:
Hostage wrote:

respond and make her mad somehow

maxi123 wrote:

reply with some rude joke or an insult
if its a bot it will ignore that, otherwise it will reply back with corresponding behavior

Why be rude with someone anonymous that didn't even insulted you at first?

Do you seriously believe there is a nice woman named Tina who is so sweet and kind and eager to meet him, Amds? Because obviously it's not a child molester or anything like that... It's just Tina!

#4 Re: Graphics Suggestions » Item Revamps » 2016-04-25 14:08:03

Ben

Yeah Zoey's suggestion is just in the right place. I was aiming more for the color neutrality.

#5 Re: Graphics Suggestions » Item Revamps » 2016-04-25 13:28:13

Ben

I hate to break it to you, but this smiley sucks. It really does feel out of place, especially after the rest of the smileys have been improved by Toop. If you MrShoe lovers can't recognize it, ask any veteran and they'll approve my point..

#6 Re: Graphics Suggestions » Item Revamps » 2016-04-25 12:44:28

Ben

Life is all about moving on and admitting mistakes

#8 Graphics Suggestions » Introducing the DIAMOND PACK! » 2016-04-22 15:22:21

Ben
Replies: 16
► Diamond Pack

Presenting the new Diamond Pack:

xkrqlx.png

Top The items acquired after purchasing a diamond.

Bottom The diamond effect, extended to the 6 basic smileys (cake-like mechanics).


Right now the diamond block costs 1000 gems alone. I figured adding more features to the pack would make it much more popular, considering it's a permanent purchase.

#9 Re: Game Discussion » Moderation Of EE » 2016-04-11 20:48:45

Ben

You're not a martyr, stop acting like that. This topic is not about you, as much as you would have wished.

So far the only thing you did was repeating the same complaints, which, alongside with the fact that you wooted AK712's subversive post, shows that you only seek to provoke the admins.


JaWapa wrote:

Paying for chat does not magically get rid of all the problems.

So what will?

JaWapa wrote:

There still needs to be moderation.

Yeah, we understand, but how can we achieve that?

JaWapa wrote:

It doesn't matter that they voluntarily paid for it, they aren't the ones at fault here.

Then whose fault is that, and what should we do about it?

#10 Re: Game Discussion » Moderation Of EE » 2016-04-11 13:15:21

Ben

Zoey, you're missing the point. He's just throwing complaints at everyone instead of making ACTUAL SUGGESTIONS.

This entire topic practically serves as a comfortable platform to go "Oh, since I'm not a mod anymore but hold a grudge against you, I'm gonna make a huge drama". I bet he would have never made that topic if he were still a staff member.

How about proposing solutions? Idk, maybe have censoring automatically turned on when the owner is gone, or limit the chat traffic so that players wouldn't assemble in potentially non-child-safe worlds. Believe me, I want the best for this game, but what Jawapa attempted to achieve with this topic is absolute provocation.

#11 Re: Game Discussion » Moderation Of EE » 2016-04-11 09:28:08

Ben

You have some serious recovery issues, Jawapa. If you cared so much about this game, you wouldn't have stolen so much money form it, and therefore perhaps you could have been preventing the exact issues that you're complaining about, as you would have never been banned.

I'm not quite sure what you expect them to do. Hire more mods? Who then? You? Obviously not. There's a very simple solution to everything that you're trying to convey on this topic. World owners have full control over what is taking place in their worlds. If a world owner finds anyone to be a nuisance, they can use kicking or muting. Apart from that, if it hurts you to hear about sex and drugs, turn on censoring. You're on the internet, chap. The responsibility is only yours (and maybe your parents' too).

#12 Re: Graphics Suggestions » Throwup Smiley » 2016-04-09 22:00:57

Ben

@Johnnycraig Beta items will eventually become non-beta too. It's usually a matter of a few weeks.

To post an image all you need to do is upload an image to an online host (tinypic.com for instance) and use the image link like so:

[img]insert link here[/img]


Shoutout to all the lovely commenters - this just shows how mature and supporting our community is. Either that or I really am missing something.

Peace <3

#13 Re: Game Business » Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!] » 2016-03-28 22:38:29

Ben

I believe deadline extension is inevitable. Am I the only one?

#14 Re: Bug Reports » Crew Colors Hex » 2015-09-29 14:11:48

Ben

@Era The first one is always auto-selected. Still doesn't work

#16 Re: Bug Reports » Login box » 2015-09-20 15:10:51

Ben

You had plenty of time to discuss it in the revamp topic, please don't do it here.

#17 Bug Reports » Login box » 2015-09-20 14:22:49

Ben
Replies: 6

Not really a bug, but the login box shows the old soldier smiley
image.png

#19 Re: Game Discussion » Gem codes thread » 2015-09-13 09:41:54

Ben

Stop asking people for free gems, nubs.

#20 Re: Game Discussion » Switch Labyrinth PATHS » 2015-09-10 15:48:04

Ben

People will always share the answers... You can fight that. There's already a site and a google docs file where you can find the solutions.

The answer to that issue is the very thing you said; no more puzzle campaigns. At least not puzzles that require you to follow a certain path.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1733250903.216 - Generated in 0.300 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.44 MiB (Peak: 1.6 MiB) ]