Official Everybody Edits Forums

dcomet

Member

From: Dipstick Kingdom

Joined: 2016-11-20

Posts: 788

Gold Membership Worlds

This may be what you're expecting, "A gold membership exclusive world? that's just stupid."

Nope, not that.
What I was thinking for Gold Membership was this, A Gold Membership "Gold Great World", "Gold Huge World", and "Gold Vertical Great World"

▼Dimensions of said Worlds

Gold Great World, 600x400, which is 150% larger than the Great World.
Gold Huge World, 500x500, which is 166.6% larger than the Huge World.
Gold Vertical World, 400x600, which is 150% larger than the Vertical Great World

▼How to obtain

Monthly, depending on the day you purchased GM, you can have the choice between the three.
"What happens if I run out of Gold Membership?"
Nothing. After all, you donated money for the game.
"Will I be able to buy it with Energy/Gems?"
I doubt that.

The best part? You can share it with the public. No "exclusiveness" to the worlds, it's 100% public.
Anything you can adjust to fit the game better? I'd love to hear feedback.

---

@MAMETCHl on twitter for the pfp artist, @snuffyowo on twitter for the character drawn in the pfp.

Myst

Guest

Re: Gold Membership Worlds

this is impossible, big worlds can't be saved

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,097

Website

Re: Gold Membership Worlds

So far besides the Gold Membership gates/doors that almost nobody uses, all benefits from it have been visual-only. I'm not sure how willing the Staff would be to change that.

hummerz5

Member

From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 5,852

Re: Gold Membership Worlds

this is impossible, big worlds can't be saved

misconception: they can be saved, just not full of random stuff.

That is, I can save my 2000x2000, but it takes a while to load and is more prone to that saving bug... which I don't know if that's ever been fixed but I digress.

So far besides the Gold Membership gates/doors that almost nobody uses, all benefits from it have been visual-only. I'm not sure how willing the Staff would be to change that.

I agree, I'm a fan of keeping functionality public-ish. One could argue that avoiding the creation of exclusive content would logically follow from the latest crusades of making things free. (and cheaper (worlds)). Therefore, it would be contradictory.

---

thanks HG, HG, HG, HG! anatoly, zumza! zoey!