Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Let's make EEU forums for special members from EEU
Leave it for Kongregate.
Add the facebook emojis.
I see US is about to be curbstomped by China's very fast GDP grow and I predict India will beat China still this century judging how quick they've been growing lately. I also expect India's surrounding countries (like UAE and Bangladesh) and even other asian countries to grow a lot in economy.
My hope is that South America has a lot of potential to grow up too, but that may still take time. I think the world is about to take a big turn to Eastern economy and it now feels weird to think English is the most known language in the world.
Creature wrote:i think "Lenin" was the only word guessed right
thats at least something
I used to think "America" was also guessed right.
I prefer giant avatars over no avatars.
Creature wrote:Tomahawk wrote:Sounds like you wanna turn the forums into Discord.
Why not?
Probably because the title is really similar to the campaign slogan used by the current president of the USA, which is a prime way to get people to think you're meming.
Yeah, I like the slogan, it reflects the good old times something interesting happened in this forums rather than it being an inactive junk. I intend to make the forums great again.
Creature wrote:Different55 wrote:Just don't purposefully try to evade them and make sure to wrap content that the censors can't block, like images.
I suppose that I should use a spoiler with NSFW for images, right?
No NSFW allowed.
EDIT: I'm assuming we're talking about the birds and the bees here, and also gore.
Well, I'm talking about swears in images.
Just don't purposefully try to evade them and make sure to wrap content that the censors can't block, like images.
I suppose that I should use a spoiler with NSFW for images, right?
Lulz, I couldn't tell if the original post was serious.
Sounds like you wanna turn the forums into Discord.
Why not?
Still, I use the forums over Discord because I want to keep track of the conversation and I want to somewhat focus upon something rather than saying "hey let's discuss about X" just to it eventually be diverged and completely drowned out.
So what if I want to post the way I want and troll a little along the way?
Creature wrote:and
Crybaby wrote:
Creature wrote:
So would this post be classified as an acceptable doublepost (assuming it comes right after my previous post)?No.
It doesn't help that you did it deliberately.
I actually prefer to doublepost sometimes. I feel a lot better quoting one part of your post, replying to it, then quoting another part of your post into a separate post.
It doesn't hinder the discussion and sometimes it's even easier to read for the people that are more likely to read multiple short posts than one giant wallpost. I myself am one of these people.
Creature wrote:I thought having a rule leniency here would make the users more comfortable posting over going like "oh damn, can I make a good enough post to engage into the discussion?".
The rules are rather lenient as it is. You could post "I'm not too sure any of this is a good idea" and you would be just fine. I don't know why you think the rules are far stricter than any other place.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/warni … how_recent
and
Creature wrote:So would this post be classified as an acceptable doublepost (assuming it comes right after my previous post)?
No.
Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:So, if I told you "oh hell no" right now, are you going to have a brand spanking new idea on how to make the forum rules better?
You're expressing your opinion.
You may eventually follow with an argument afterwards. That's what I usually do in mafiascum.
This is not Mafiascum.
Most forums are like this, even kids forums.
This is not most forums. This is Everybody Edits forum. You're trying to turn this forum into something it isn't.
I was suggesting how this forum can be more vivid. Like, I find the debate platform here way better than mafiascum's and I would love debating here (whether through off-topic or debate section). Though, I usually first make one not-very-useful post before I eventually find myself engaged in a discussion. I thought having a rule leniency here would make the users more comfortable posting over going like "oh damn, can I make a good enough post to engage into the discussion?".
Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:So, if I told you "oh hell no" right now, are you going to have a brand spanking new idea on how to make the forum rules better?
You're expressing your opinion.
You may eventually follow with an argument afterwards. That's what I usually do in mafiascum.
This is not Mafiascum.
Most forums are like this, even kids forums.
So, if I told you "oh hell no" right now, are you going to have a brand spanking new idea on how to make the forum rules better?
You're expressing your opinion.
You may eventually follow with an argument afterwards. That's what I usually do in mafiascum.
If you want to chat freely as if it were a hangout, there's a discussion for that already: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=31371
What if I want to talk about something? I would rather have a topic and not have the "only useful posts allowed, no occasional chatting" rule.
Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:So, keep a rule already in place? How, then, are you
I mean actually warning for spam when there's actual intentional flooding over freaking out whenever someone makes one single "No" post.
Except, those people do get warned. Creature I know you haven't been here in a while, and I don't remember very clearly the state of things for when you were here last, but it's not the same as back then, right now. If people deserve a punishment for breaking a rule, they'll get that warning. If they haven't gotten it but you think action is needed, that's what the report tool is for
Punishing someone for making a one-word/not very useful post is still harsh. I would feel pretty umcomfortable posting in a thread under the "only useful posts allowed" rule.
There's a pretty visible line between posting a short post that's relevant to the topic and and posting "hi". If you don't feel comfortable with posting in a thread about that thread's topic, why are you even in that thread in the first place?
You don't know how many interesting ideas you're missing by not letting people talk more freely.
Like, whenever I reply someone one simple "Oh hell no" it can be a seed for a broad new interesting idea.
I am hanging mostly on the off-topic section (occasionally commenting on the game-related sections).
Feel free to open up a debate with me. Just don't make the thread anonymous, I checked them just now and I already remembered how much I despite them.
Creature wrote:Crybaby wrote:So, keep a rule already in place? How, then, are you
I mean actually warning for spam when there's actual intentional flooding over freaking out whenever someone makes one single "No" post.
Except, those people do get warned. Creature I know you haven't been here in a while, and I don't remember very clearly the state of things for when you were here last, but it's not the same as back then, right now. If people deserve a punishment for breaking a rule, they'll get that warning. If they haven't gotten it but you think action is needed, that's what the report tool is for
Punishing someone for making a one-word/not very useful post is still harsh. I would feel pretty umcomfortable posting in a thread under the "only useful posts allowed" rule.
More than just the signature is a problem. It's just exceptionally problematic if they do have a big one. Regardless, double-posting still has certain leniencies, as I have said. To post new content in your thread, you may double post. Alternatively, you can revive a dead topic with content depending on the thread. This happens a lot in Graphics Suggestions, in particular.
So would this post be classified as an acceptable doublepost (assuming it comes right after my previous post)?
So, keep a rule already in place? How, then, are you
I mean actually warning for spam when there's actual intentional flooding over freaking out whenever someone makes one single "No" post.
The "no-doubleposting" rule already has some leniencies that come with it already. Removing the doubleposting rule encourages people to post multiple posts one after the other, and unless you've edited your posts per page settings, you're going to be seeing a lot of posts coming from one person on a single page, which is especially annoying if their signature is long.
If the sig is a problem, I'm pretty sure it can be disabled somewhere (or just limit sigs from having giant images).
None. If they were that interesting, they'd be made into a new topic. Simple as that.
What if they are slightly related to the topic but the poster is afraid of it being offtopic?
Do you have any hobby you would like to share (besides playing EE obviously)?
- - Banned - - (Forbidden from crew)
I removed the members:
-
JABONBON17 (Developer)▼ It happens?BYTEBARRY (Problem)
▼ It happens?
I suppose this is your favorite list to make.
[ Started around 1713850150.7353 - Generated in 0.915 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 2.11 MiB (Peak: 4.03 MiB) ]